The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the 'agentur' of the 'Illuminati' between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism mutually destroy each other. Meanwhile the other nations, once more divided on this issue will be constrained to fight to the point of complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion. - Albert PikeThere are three sentences in the above quotation.
The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the 'agentur' of the 'Illuminati' between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism mutually destroy each other. Meanwhile the other nations, once more divided on this issue will be constrained to fight to the point of complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion.
Pike states that the aim of world war 3 is to cause general chaos by manipulation of the friction between Zionism and Islam, for which purpose Israel was created. The chaos is being caused by Israel invading its neighbours and Islam reacting with terrorism, or so it would appear. The stage is set for a global war between Islam and Zionism, and Zionism now includes not just Israel but the USA. For years terrorists, both Zionist (in the form of the IDF) and Islamic (in the form of PLO etc), have been killing innocent civilians on the opposite side. But now the Zionists appear to have overt control of the USA. Israel could not have survived without the assistance it has received from the USA, now standing at $3 billion per year and always rising.
There were Islamic terrorist actions before 11th September 2001, e.g. the kidnap of Israeli athletes at 1972 Munich Olympics recently dramatized by Steven Spielberg in his film "Munich". But on 11th September 2001 Islamic terrorism came to the USA in a big way. Islamic terrorism had found a sanctuary in London, or "Londonistan" as it is called, and was allowed if not encouraged to grow. The alleged mastermind of 9/11 Osama bin Laden had a mansion there, and had been trained by MI6 in Scotland. I say alleged because the FBI has not listed 9/11 as a crime for which bin Laden is wanted. The FBI say they do not have sufficient evidence to indict bin Laden. And if bin Laden had gone to all that trouble of financing and training and planning for the greatest terrorist attack ever, why has he not come forward and claimed responsibility? After all it appears the plan succeeded. There have been some very suspicious tapes of men who at first sight could be bin Laden, but on closer inspection are overweight, have different facial features, etc., which lead many to suspect that the tapes are false. There are also suspicions that bin Laden is dead, and the coalition of the willing know this but do not want to release the information because it would reduce the support for the 'war on terror'.
Following 9/11 the USA invaded Afghanistan and Iraq. Both countries are now in disarray, particularly Iraq. This has seriously cheezed off a lot of Muslims. Israel has stepped up its attacks on its neighbours, invading and laying waste to Lebanon under some highly suspicious circumstances during the summer of 2006. In the mid-1990's several members of the Bush Administration while working at the Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies wrote a report for Benjamin Netanyahu, the buddy of Dick Cheney and then Prime Minister of Israel. The report was entitled A Clean Break : A New Strategy for Securing the Realm which called for a massive expansion of Israel, in gaining territory and influence. One target was Lebanon. Another was Iraq. Well, let's see. Iraq has been invaded and is about to splinter into three regions of lesser power, and Lebanon was emptied of Syrian influence after Syria was blamed for the assassination of Rafik Hariri, and was recently invaded by Israel under a highly suspicious pretext, the kidnap of two IDF soldiers on the Israel/Lebanon border. Iran now seems to be the next target, with more and more bogus reports about Iran and 'the bomb'. This aggression by Israel and its Zionist chum the USA stokes the flames of anger in the world of Islam. To add to this images and reports of torture and abuse at American detention centres, Guantanamo, Abu Ghraib, and the publication of cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed contribute to drive Islam into a state of frenzy. This will lead to more Islamic terrorism, which will result in the arrest of Muslims, probably known to be innocent so when released their torture in an American detention centre can be used to show the USA as "The Great Satan" and act as a recruiting sergeant, inevitably leading to more terrorism, and on and on and on... The never-ending cycle of violence will escalate, with the world continuously divided by the issue.
But Remember! All this tension and violence would not exist if Israel had not come into existence in the manner it did. I argue that besides Communism taking hold in WW1, Palestine was deliberately stolen from the Arabs by the British and given to the Zionists with a long term plan in mind, which then permitted mass Jewish immigration into Palestine, which has led to the friction between Islam and Zionism we now see today.
According to Pike's plan, Communism was to be held in check until the final social cataclysm. We saw in the previous chapter on World War 2 how Communism was kept in check; wars in South East Asia, NATO, etc. From the end of World War 2 the Cold War kept mankind divided, and terrified of a nuclear war. But then in 1989, the Berlin Wall came down. Eastern Europe, Russia and China, all part of the Soviet Bloc, have since been gradually converting from Communism to a "free market economy", under the guiding hand of Great Britain and America.
We saw the hand of the manipulators in the late 1970's financing the Mujahideen against the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. As an outcome of this, the Islamic terrorism of today can be traced back to the relationship between the CIA, MI6 and the Mujahideen. It is argued by some that this 'blowback' was unexpected. I would argue this 'blowback' was all planned, and later encouraged with a number of Islamic Fundamentalists locating their headquarters in London, from where they could plot their Islamic Fundamentalist terrorism without fear due to the Covenant of Security between themselves and MI5, in which they could terrorize and kill anywhere they wanted as long as British interests weren't affected.
Mikhail Gorbachev led the Soviet Union in its dying years, and implemented glasnost and perestroika. The Soviet Union was disolved, and member states of the Soviet Union were allowed to go their own way. As a consequence, Gorbachev was loved in the British and American media. Boris Yeltsin began to capitalise on the opening up of the USSR and demanded further reform. Yeltsin was surrounded by a gang of oligarchs, who economically raped Russia and did a runner, to either London or Tel Aviv, where they are now safe from prosecution. Gorbachev went to the USA, where
For his work in disolving the Soviet Union, promoting the green agenda and one-worldism, Gorbachev was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1990.
Russia was economically raped during the 1990's after Boris Yeltsin gave away Russia's economy and natural resources to a handful of very wealthy businessmen, most of whom had strong connections to Israel and/or London. Vladimir Putin came to power on a wave of bombings attributed to Chechens, though there are allegations that elements of Russian Security Services had a hand in the foiled bombs meant to blow up an appartment block in Ryazan. Putin then pardoned Yeltsin, but then appeared to want to regain control of Russia's economy and natural resources, renegotiating energy contracts with BP and Shell in favour of Russia. Around the same time as this, in 2006, former KGB agent and defector Alexander Litvinenko died after apparently being poisoned with Polonium-210. Litvinenko's radioactive finger pointed at Putin. The British Government also accused Putin, and compiled a report accusing Andrei Lugovoy. Lugovoy replied by accusing British Security Services, who he claims tried to recruit him, an offer he declined. Thus, Luguvoy claims, the British Security Services have a motive to frame him. Luguvoy also claims Litvinenko was also working for British Security Services in one way or another.
Putin had earlier arrested one of the economic rapers of the 1990's, Mikhail Khodorkovsky, who was sentenced to ten years in prison for fraud, and who incidentally gave all his shares in Yukos to Lord Jacob Rothschild. There has gradually been a cooling in relations between America, Great Britain and Israel on one side, and Russia on the other. Russia is becoming a great source of fossil fuel, giving Russia alot of money and influence. Russia also appears to be independent of Washington, not bowing down before the United States while its former client states of the former USSR are experiencing "colour revolutions" in which pro-NATO leaders are elected, who subsequently ally with Washington and London. One such state is Georgia. A missile defence system, that can easily be turned into offence and aimed at Russia, is being installed in Poland and The Czech Republic, which Russia strongly objects to. All this imperialism by America, urged on by Great Britain, is creating a lot of threats of military conflict between Moscow and Washington.
Russia is also supplying Iran with nuclear technology and fuel, building the Bushehr plant, which is assumed to be one of the prime targets for a first-strike by Israel, or the USA, or both. Should this first-strike occur and Russian citizens are killed, things could get ugly quickly.
Russia also seems to want to stop the push for war in the Middle East. The meeting at Annapolis in December 2007 between concerned states in the Middle East may well have failed if Russia had not persuaded Saudi Arabia to attend, which in turn persuaded Syria to attend. Following the meeting, there was a definite sense of co-operation and hope for peace, and Russia suggested that it host a follow-up meeting soon after to continue the talks.
Kosovo is also being used to provoke military conflict between the USA and Russia.
Many conspiracy theorists, including myself, point to Bilderberg as a source of agents propagating the conspiracy. Although attendance at Bilderberg does not guarantee 100% loyalty to 'the conspiracy', it is a very good indicator as to who is in and who is out. Anyone who attends more than once is very likely to be a gofer, and if they attend more than twice then it is guaranteed. An analysis of Russian attendees to Bilderberg shows that neither Putin nor any of his allies has attended Bilderberg. Bilderberg showed very little interest in Russia during the 1990's, when Yeltsin was selling off assets for a shot of vodka. It has only been since the late 1990's that Russian citizens have attended Bilderberg. Those that have attended are members of pro-Western think tanks, e.g. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, and regularly have their criticisms of Putin and Russia published in the American media, e.g. The Washington Post, and British media, e.g. The Daily Telegraph. The goal of these pro-Western think-tanks is to 'suggest', i.e. command, to other nations what to do.
So to me, it would appear that
However, I think something similar happened to FDR. FDR came to power after the engineered Wall Street Crash of 1929 and the subsequent depression. FDR was protrayed as a saviour of the nation, but subsequently increased America's debt to the warmongering bankers six-fold, and engineered the Pearl Harbour attack to drag Americans into a world war that he promised he would stay out of. It could be that the same mass psychology is being applied in Russia, though not in exactly the same way. Putin came to power after Russian assets had been sold off, and Russia's market economy was in dire straits. Putin has used Russia's fossil fuel wealth to build a resurgent Russia, though some would comment that global fuel prices helped. Whether Putin could have arrested more oligarchs who fled with their billions to London and Tel Aviv is unlikely, except for some Russian rendition, which I am unaware of.
China has not suffered the same fate as Russia, and still has a strong Communist aura about it. Both Russia and China are strong allies and have held joint military exercises together. Sudan, with Iran, is becoming a source of conflict between the USA and China.
The USA increased its presence in the Middle East and Caspian Basin and began this overt, aggressive and provocative imperialism after the events of 11th September 2001. Things undoubtedly took a turn for the worse on that murdered September day. It was definitely one of those events for which you remember where you were when you first heard the news and saw the pictures of the planes cruising into the WTC towers. Whenever the USA wants to do anything now, it is always, "9/11. 9/11. 9/11", although that is wearing a bit thin now, and they know it. Since 9/11 there have been several terrorist attacks across the world that have been blamed on Islamic terrorists, including in Madrid, London and Mumbai. But were they really genuine attacks, or what are called "false-flag" attacks, designed to be blamed on someone and used as a pretext for action, be it military invasion and/or introduction of police-state rule?
What events have been used as "false-flag" operations before?
And were the terrorist atrocities on 9/11 and 7/7 examples of "false-flag" operations?
It is fair to say that American politics is controlled by Zionists. The Zionists control the finances of the government through The Federal Reserve, and influence politicians through such lobbying organizations as JINSA, AIPAC, etc. Zionists have recently published two documents that call for medium-to-large scale war in the Middle East and elsewhere, but particularly in the Middle East.
In 1996 The Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies published a document entitled A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm. Its authors included
Douglas Feith was given control of the Defense Policy Board in the Bush Administration, which was supposed to give independent advice to The Secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld, but as Rumsfeld was already a member of an organization calling for the invasion of Iraq, indeed most of the world, that didn't matter. Feith appointed Richard Perle to the board, as well as Henry Kissinger. Feith also created The Office of Special Plans, which fed unconfirmed intelligence on Iraq to The White House, intelligence that has since turned out to be completely false.
In 1998 The Project For a New American Century (PNAC) was founded. The founders of PNAC included
In Septemer 2000 PNAC published a document entitled, Rebuilding America's Defenses which, as luck may have it for Israel, called for America to go on the attack, particularly in the Middle East, even though the document title implies the motive would be defence. The document proposed four core missions for the United States military. The second of these was
fight and decisively win multiple, simultaneous major theater wars
The gist of the document was that the United States should use its position as global superpower to dominate global natural resources. For this it would need a military that was much bigger, stronger and technologically advanced than it was in 2000. PNAC recognised that such a transformation of the military would be difficult. They wrote
Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.
Authors of this document included
Zakheim's father was an active member of Betar, who united with several other Zionist organizations to bomb the British and Palestinians out of Palestine.
The document singles out Iraq and Iran for special attention, proposing forward bases in the Persian Gulf to protect American interests in that region.
So here we have two documents published by Zionists and senior members of the Bush Administration, some of whom were or were advised by Zionists, calling for military action on Iraq and Iran. We also know that these warmongers recognised the need for a 'new Pearl Harbor' to progress with these plans. That 'new Pearl Harbor' happened on 11th Septemer 2001.
FDR implemented all eight.
Commander in Chief, United States Fleet Admiral James O. Richardson complained to FDR about the lack of facilities at Pearl Harbor as a permanent base for the Pacific Fleet, and its vulnerability to attack, and suggested to FDR that the Pacific Fleet be stationed on the West Coast of the USA instead. Richardson was sacked and replaced by Admiral Husband Kimmel, who obliged FDR by using Pearl Harbor. FDR knew the Japanese were sailing towards Pearl Harbor and said nothing to them. Even Churchill knew from British agents within the Japanese government, and told FDR on the 26th November to expect an attack on Pearl Harbor on the 8th December (the 8th in Japan is the 7th in Hawaii). On 29th November US Secretary of State Cordell Hull informed freelance journalist Joseph Leib that Pearl Harbour was about to be attacked, but despite being given the documentation proving Hull's claim Leib's friend, UP Washington office chief Lyle Wilson, would not believe it and Wilson refused to print the story. Kimmel, sensing war was imminent, put the Pacific fleet out to see, but was ordered by FDR to put the fleet back into dock at Pearl Harbor. FDR and Churchill knew what was coming. Pearl Harbor was attacked. Nearly 3000 died. America was outraged. In the following furore FDR blamed Kimmel. FDR and Churchill got the USA into WW2.
In 1962, during the Cold War, the US Joint Chiefs of Staff prepared a document called Operation Northwoods. Northwoods called for simulated terror attacks on American people and interests which would be blamed on Cuba, thus giving America an excuse to invade Cuba. Some of the proposed false-flag terror attacks in Northwoods were
The author who discovered this document, James Bamford, and reported it to the world, said in his book Body of Secrets
Operation Northwoods, which had the written approval of the Chairman and every member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, called for innocent people to be shot on American streets; for boats carrying refugees fleeing Cuba to be sunk on the high seas; for a wave of violent terrorism to be launched in Washington, D.C., Miami, and elsewhere. People would be framed for bombings they did not commit; planes would be hijacked. Using phony evidence, all of it would be blamed on Castro, thus giving Lemnitzer and his cabal the excuse, as well as the public and international backing, they needed to launch their war.Substitute Osama bin Oswald for Castro, and what do you get?
In early June 1967 Israel started The Six Day War against its neighours Egypt, Syria and Jordan, with other neighbouring Arab states contributing troops to help the fight against Israel. The USS Liberty, a spy ship for the US Navy, was sent into the Eastern Mediterannean Sea to monitor communications. It was sent without any military back-up, despite several requests. During the first days of this short war, the USS Liberty was flown over and circled by Israeli jets a number of times. But on the fourth day of the war, the USS Liberty was attacked by a number of unmarked Israeli jets. Israel claimed that the USS Liberty had been misidentified for an Egyptian horse carrier called El Quseir. The two ships do not have the same profile, and USS Liberty is much bigger than El Quseir. In the enquiries into the incident that followed, all surviving personnel on board USS Liberty stated that the USS Liberty was flying the Stars and Stripes. Several others have come forward, including Israelis, to state that Israel knew it was attacking a US ship. So why would Israel attack the USS Liberty? In 2003 British journalist Peter Hounam published a book entitled "Operation Cyanide: How the Bombing of the USS Liberty Nearly Caused World War III", in which Hounam related the facts about an agreement reached between the highest levels of the Israeli and American governments. The purpose of Operation Cyanide was for Israel to attack and sink the Liberty leaving no survivors, and for the attack to then be blamed on Egypt. A BBC documentary entitled "Dead in the Water" seemed to back this theory up with evidence that the USAF had launched nuclear armed planes destined for Cairo, but they were called back when it was found the Liberty had not been sunk and there were survivors.
So now we know that a hardcore group of ultra-Zionists have recently published two documents calling for large scale war in the Middle East to expand and secure Israel, and that government military and intelligence networks are not necessarily there for the protection of the public who pay them, let us take a closer look at the event that kicked off the current turmoil in the Middle East; September 11th 2001.
On 11th September 2001, the Vice President of the USA, Dick Cheney, the founder of PNAC who wanted 'a new Pearl Harbor' to expand the US military and execute multiple simultaneous wars, particularly in the Middle East, was in charge of all counter terrorist actions, including exercises and simulations. He had unexpectedly been given this assignment by President George Bush in May 2001. During the week of 11th September 2001, and on that murdered day, there were several simulations of terrorist attacks on the North Eastern sector of American air space. Other exercises that week required the bulk of the USAF to be thousands of miles away from the North Eastern sector. Some of the exercises running that week and on the day were
The Kean-Zelikow Report failed to mention these exercises, or Cheney's control of them. Why?
The Kean-Zelikow Report also found the following;
At 0814 AA11 failed to respond to a call to climb to 35000ft. At 0821 AA11 switched off its transponder and began to go off course. At 0824 the following was overheard over the transmitter of AA11
"We have some planes. Just stay quiet, and you'll be okay. We are returning to the airport...Nobody move. Everything will be okay. If you try to make any moves, you'll endanger yourself and the airplane. Just stay quiet."
This immediately indicates a hijack. But somehow, AA11 flew unimpeded into 1 WTC twenty two minutes later.
The plane that allegedly flew into the Pentagon was American Airlines 77, or AA77. Their conclusion on what happened with AA77 is
From this series of events it would appear that what happened that day was simply a massive cock-up. But hang on! The whole world was aware at 09:03:11 that the USA was under attack because live pictures were being screened across the world of UA175 flying into WTC2. Even President George W Bush was told of this while at Booker Elementary School, but he continued to read a fascinating book called My Pet Goat.
But for some reason the people tasked with keeping the airspace above North East America safe were not.}
As for the Langley fighters flying over the Atlantic Ocean, the reason given for this is that the standard procedure for a scramble from Langley is that, in order to get the fighters airborne and out of local airspace quickly, they fly east for 60 miles. The pilots took this, allegedly, to override the original scramble order. But we know that the original scramble was for Washington, which was then changed for Baltimore. When exactly were these orders given, and to whom? And when were they relayed to the pilots? Was the order "east for 60 miles" the standard procedure at Langley?
But this begs the question; Why were fighters scrambled from Langley at all when there is an air base much closer to Washington, as you would expect?
Andrews Air Force Base is much, much closer to Washington DC than Langley. Andrews is approximately 11 miles from Washington DC centre, i.e. The Pentagon and White House. It is the home of Air Force One, the President's plane. As such it should be very well protected, and constantly on or close to full alert. Why were fighters not scrambled from Andrews? Andrews is mentioned several times in the official Kean-Zelikow Report, but no explanation is given as to why fighters were not scrambled from there instead of Langley. Fighters from Andrews were eventually scrambled, but only at 1038, i.e. after the Pentagon had been hit, and only then after someone from the Secret Service was phoned by someone from Andrews who heard a rumour that the Secret Service might want some fighters airborne over Washington!
The images you find in the mainstream media of the flight path of AA77 imply that it came in from the West. But radar operators say the radar signal from AA77 (or the plane thought to be AA77) came in from the North, flew over the White House (an easier target even though it has a missile protection system, which wasn't used), then performed an incredible 270 degree turn while descending sharply, and flew into the West Wing of The Pentagon. So why would AA77 make such a turn, risk being intercepted or crashing, and fly into that particular part of the Pentagon?
There is one damning piece of testimony which would blow the whole official cover story to smithereens if it was released in a report such as the Kean-Zelikow report. During the Commission hearings the then Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta gave his account of what went on in the emergency bunker underneath The White House where senior officials had rushed to meet, the Presidential Office Emergency Center (PEOC). Mineta described what Dick Cheney said as what was believed to be AA77 was racing towards Washington DC;
"During the time that the airplane was coming into the Pentagon, there was a young man who would come in and say to the Vice President...the plane is 50 miles out...the plane is 30 miles out...and when it got down to the plane is 10 miles out, the young man also said to the vice president, 'do the orders still stand?” And the Vice President turned and whipped his neck around and said 'Of course the orders still stand, have you heard anything to the contrary!??'"
This was in answer to Commissioner Hamilton. In a subsequent Q&A session with Commissioner Roemer, Mineta says he was not sure the planes scrambled for DC had orders to shoot down.
Roemer: "Would your inference be that they scrambled the jets to shoot down the commercial airliner, it failed, and the commercial airliner then crashed into the Pentagon?"
Mineta: "I’m not sure that the aircraft that were scrambled to come up to the D.C. area...were under orders to shoot the airplane down..."
Mineta testified that he arrived at the PEOC at 0920, and that this interaction between Cheney and the young man began a few minutes later, which would be about chronologically correct, for AA77 allegedly struck the Pentagon at 0937. But what this testimony does is create some doubt over Cheney's whereabouts on the morning of 9/11, and also the status of any shoot down orders. The Kean-Zelikow report concluded that Cheney got to the PEOC just before 1000, too late to issue any orders. The fact that the Pentagon was hit does lend some credence to Mineta's testimony. However, THIS TESTIMONY WAS IGNORED IN THE FINAL REPORT! In fact the commission archives have no video record of this testimony, though it can be found at various 9/11 Truth Movement websites. Was Cheney refusing to scramble from Andrews? And who was the young gentleman referred to by Mineta? Can he not confirm Mineta's allegation?
So why would Cheney risk managing the execution of the events of 11th September 2001? Besides the A Clean Break and Rebuilding America's Defenses documents, is there another motive?
Cheney is an oil man. In Autumn 1999 Dick Cheney gave a speech to the Institute of Petroleum, in which he said
...That means by 2010 we will need on the order of an additional fifty million barrels a day. So where is the oil going to come from? Governments and the national oil companies are obviously controlling about ninety per cent of the assets. Oil remains fundamentally a government business. While many regions of the world offer great oil opportunities, the Middle East with two thirds of the world‘s oil and the lowest cost, is still where the prize ultimately lies,
The rich oil fields of Iraq were nationalised in 1972, when Royal Dutch Shell was kicked out. Iraq used the wealth from this oil to build a state that showed what Arab nationalism could do when void of any Western economic influence, and so Iraq threatened Israel, not militarily but economically. By 1978 Iraq was a jewel. But then in 1979 CIA-trained Saddam Hussein executed a silent coup and took control of Iraq. He subsequently ran Iraq into the ground. He fought a war against Iran for a decade, with significant American assistance. He then invaded Kuwait, after a similar statement was made to him as that which King Edward gave to Kaiser Wilhelm that England would stay out of any war. When Saddam invaded Kuwait, the USA and UK declared war. Inexplicably Saddam was left in power after Operation Desert Storm. We even encouraged a revolution against Saddam, but then betrayed that revolution at the last minute allowing Saddam to isolate the revolutionaries, and exterminate them. Although beaten in an unnecessary war, Saddam became stronger because the internal resistance to him had been destroyed. Throughout the 1990's Iraq was the subject of a trade embargo and had to sell oil on the black market. This helped to keep oil prices higher because there was less oil on the open market. So was Saddam a sleeper, taking control of Iraq to control its oil, keep oil prices higher, turning Iraq into a shithole until the time was right for Anglo-American oil companies to go in under a false pretext and take control of the oil, i.e. after 9/11?
"We are Israelis. We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians are your problem."Sniffer dogs detected traces of explosives in the van in which they were travelling, but no explosives were found in their van. They denied being in the places where witnesses saw them, but when a film found in the van in which they were driving was processed, photographs showed them in those locations and appearing very happy with the WTC in the background.
Although their lawyer, Steven Gordon, says that within hours of questioning the FBI thought that the five had no connection to the 9/11 attacks, they were still held for 71 days in solitary confinement. During this time the company they said they worked for, Urban Moving Systems, was investigated and was strongly suspected of being an Israeli intelligence front. Its owner Dominik Otto Suter quickly fled back to Israel before requestioning by the FBI, leaving the UMS office in a total mess, and thousands of dollars worth of goods still in storage. Suter was placed on the same terrorist suspect list as Mohammed Atta. The five were quietly sent back to Israel without charge, but were accused of visa violations. Upon their return to Israel they were interviewed live on Israeli TV. During this interview one of them admitted
"The fact of the matter is we are coming from a country that experiences terror daily. Our purpose was to document the event"Did they know 9/11 was coming? Why did they celebrate all the death and destruction with such joy?
Shortly after the attacks, Dick Cheney's friend and former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (for whom the 'A Clean Break' document was written) was interviewed live on American TV, and when asked what the 9/11 attacks meant for US/Israel relations replied,
"It's very good...Well, it's not good, but it will generate immediate sympathy for Israel from Americans."In March 2001, the White House Office of the National Counterintelligence Executive issued the following warning;
"In the past six weeks, employees in federal office buildings located throughout the United States have reported suspicious activities connected with individuals representing themselves as foreign students selling or delivering artwork. Employees have observed both males and females attempting to bypass facility security and enter federal buildings. If challenged, the individuals state that they are delivering artwork from a studio in Miami, Florida, called Universal Art, Inc., or that they are art students and are looking for opinions regarding their work. These individuals have been described as aggressive. They attempt to engage employees in conversation rather than giving a sales pitch. Federal police officers have arrested two of these individuals for trespassing and discovered that the suspects possessed counterfeit work visas and green cards. These individuals have also gone to the private residences of senior federal officials under the guise of selling art."
From late 2000 to the end of 2001, approximately 200 Israelis were arrested in the USA on suspicion of terrorism, many of whom had served in the Israeli Army with expertise in explosives and electronics. Some of the cases are
Investigators of these Israelis were concerned that although they may have been spying on the alleged 9/11 hijackers, for their addresses and drop points were very close to those used by the alleged 9/11 hijackers, they may not have passed on all the information that they had gathered to the United States.
In December 2001, Carl Cameron of Fox News quoted an FBI investigator as saying to him,
"Evidence linking these Israelis to 9/11 is classified. I cannot tell you about evidence that has been gathered. It's classified information."Senator Bob Graham of the Senate Intelligence Committee, who chaired an investigation into 9/11 and was given access to hundreds of thousands of files of the NSA, CIA, etc, stated in an interview on Newshour on 11th December 2002,
"I think there is very compelling evidence that at least some of the terrorists were assisted not just in financing - although that was part of it - by a sovereign foreign government and that we have been derelict in our duty to track that down, make the further case, or find the evidence that would indicate that that is not true and we can look for other reasons why the terrorists were able to function so effectively in the United States...It will become public at some point when it's turned over to the archives, but that's 20 or 30 years from now. And, we need to have this information now because it's relevant to the threat that the people of the United States are facing today."
If this 'sovereign foreign government' was Syria, Iran or even Iraq, surely we would have heard about it. It is exactly the information required to provoke calls for war in the Middle East. But instead, the identity of this 'sovereign foreign government' will remain secret for 30 years. Graham voted against the invasion of Iraq in 2003, which indicates to me that the 'sovereign foreign government' was probably not Iraq.
Is it simply a coincidence that on 11th September 2001, the authors of 'A Clean Break' and their allies, who wanted to expand Israel and grab oil resources in the Middle East, were occupying highly influential positions in the United States?
Dick Cheney had the motive and the opportunity to organise for and execute 9/11.
Before becoming Vice-President, Cheney was on the Board of Advisers to JINSA (Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs), and he regularly speaks at AIPAC (The American Israel Public Affairs Committee) meetings, and defends Israel no matter what it does. Cheney's strong support for Israel is beyond question.
Cheney was also Chairman and Chief Executive of Halliburton in the late 1990's. Cheney still receives deferred payments from and holds stock options in Halliburton. Following 9/11, Halliburton was awarded a significant number of juicy no-bid contracts to supply the US Military. When the U.S invaded Iraq in March of 2003, Halliburton's stock was selling for $20 per share. In September 2005 their stock had more than tripled to $66 per share!
During the summer of 2001, Cheney had the power to arrange for all those terrorist simulations on and around 9/11, so that on the day very few fighters could be scrambled, and the drills also caused some confusion, and while Bush was in Florida, Cheney was in the PEOC apparently not giving out a shoot down order for what is believed to have been Flight AA77 that is alleged to have flown into the Pentagon.
Just days before the invasion of Iraq began, on 16th March 2003 Cheney was interviewed by Tim Russert on NBC's Meet The Press, and said this about Saddam and nuclear weapons;
"...we know he has been absolutely devoted to trying to acquire nuclear weapons. And we believe he has, in fact, reconstituted nuclear weapons. I think Mr. ElBaradei frankly is wrong. And I think if you look at the track record of the International Atomic Energy Agency and this kind of issue, especially where Iraq’s concerned, they have consistently underestimated or missed what it was Saddam Hussein was doing."
Cheney was selling the war with implications that he knew that Saddam had nuclear WMD. We now know Saddam did not. So why would Cheney tell such a blatant lie on live TV? What were his motiviations?
But that doesn't matter because Israel has implemented A Clean Break, Cheney's PNAC has implemented its Rebuilding America's Defenses, and Iraq's oil is going to make some very wealthy non-Iraqi citizens very, very wealthy.
Mohammed Atta was immediately named as the ringleader of the 9/11 hijackers. You could then well expect Atta to be a devout clean-living Muslim. Wrong! He lived with a stripper called Amanda Keller, loved eating pork chops, drank alcohol and took significant quantities of cocaine. Atta and Marwan Alshehhi apparently had two residences during the year before 9/11. One was in Wayne, New Jersey, and the other in Florida while they were training at the flight school Huffman Aviation.
Atta was tracked for several years before 9/11 through an intelligence operation called Able Danger. At first Able Danger was run by US Special Operations Command (SOCOM) after it was created in late 1998. It applied data mining techniques to information available in public, and did not use any information kept in secure government databases, nor it did collaborate with the CIA. In Spring of 2000 Able Danger was ordered to destroy significant quantities of information after it had identified Condoleeza Rice as a threat to national security! By September 2000 Atta was one member of a cell identified by Able Danger which it thought required further investigation by the FBI. Able Danger was told by SOCOM to put yellow stickers over the faces of the members of the cell in their documentation to indicate that they were 'off limits'. The cell also included Marwan Alshehhi, Khalid Almihdhar, and Nawaf Alhazmi, who were also named as 9/11 hijackers. Able Danger was then shut down, but was shortly reformed under the control of military contractor Raytheon, and named Able Danger II. This predicted an attack at Port Aden in Yemen, which turned out to be on the USS Cole, but no warnings were issued and nothing was done to prevent it. Able Danger was then closed down again, despite the efforts of Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer to talk to military personnel about its success. Most documents produced by Able Danger were then destroyed.
So by September 2000 Atta and three other 9/11 hijackers had been identified as a cell operating in the USA, but they were protected, and the operation that identified them was quietly shut down.
Able Danger was not mentioned once by the Kean-Zelikow Commission report. Shaffer has met with members of the commission but could not produce documentation. Is that because it was all destroyed by order?! Shaffer, US Navy Captain Scott Philpott, James D Smith of Orion Scientific Systems and Maj. Eric Kleinsmith of US Army's Land Information Warfare Activity all state that Atta and the three other 9/11 hijackers named above were identified in 2000 by Able Danger as part of a cell based in Brooklyn, New York.
After the twin towers had collapsed on 9/11, the National Institute for Standards and Technology investigated the collapse. Their initial conclusion was that the supports at the top of each tower collapsed due to heat from the fires caused by burning jet fuel, causing the tops to fall directly downwards onto the rest of the tower, causing the floors underneath to collapse one after the other as the top fell to earth, leading to the total collapse of the tower. This was labelled 'the pancake theory'. There is one large problem with this theory; it stinks!
The tops of the towers fell at virtually free-fall speed, i.e. with little resistance. But the pancake theory of the collapse states that each floor collapsed on top of the one below as the tower top fell. But wouldn't this give much resistance? The tower tops had to fall from a height of approximately 90 floors. That's 90 floors providing resistance. That's a lot of resistance.
In October 2006 NIST admitted that its pancake theory did not stand up to the evidence. But the damage was done. Everyone thinks the pancake theory is beyond doubt...everyone except 9/11 sceptics.
My initial thought upon seeing the towers collapse was...controlled demolition.
I understand that to place charges in the correct locations in the towers would have required significant amounts of time and easy access to the tower structures before the event.
But no other similar structure has collapsed due to fire. Towers in Madrid and Los Angeles have burned for much longer and remained standing, though the interiors were all gutted.
Planting charges for a controlled demolition would imply that somebody wanted to make sure that the towers collapsed. So why were the twin towers doomed to collapse? At least two reasons, possibly three. The two obvious reasons are
A third reason could be to destroy evidence of financial crimes stored in the WTC.
And WTC 7 was hardly on fire, yet that collapsed too! NIST failed to address this. Why?!
Fifteen of the alleged hijackers on September 11th 2001 were from Saudi Arabia. The alleged mastermind of that event, Osama bin Laden, was from Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia is a product of British treachery against the Arabs, after they encouraged the Arabs to rebel against their Ottoman rulers while at the same time training and arming the Ibn Saud tribe to takeover a large portion of any territory gained following any rebellion. The Ibn Saud tribe were later awarded what is now Saudi Arabia. The Ibn Saud tribe also followed a religion called Wahhabism, named after Muhammad ibn Abd-al-Wahhab, who founded his own interpretation of Islam in the 18th Century.
The interesting aspect of this is that Wahhabi may well be the product of a British Intelligence operation too! This was first proposed in Turkey in Mir'at al-Haramain by Ayyub Sabri Pasha between 1933-1938, which was translated into a series of articles in German entitled Memoirs Of Mr. Hempher, The British Spy To The Middle East and published in Der Spiegel, which were then translated into Arabic and then into English, and published under the title Confessions of a British spy and British enmity against Islam. The articles describe how British agent Hempher met Wahhabi in Basra in 1713, and began to manipulate the angry Wahhabi into a tool of British Intelligence, ranting and raving about how the Ottomans were un-Islamic, and that a new version of Islam must be formed, Wahhabism.
Is it coincidence that
Almost immediately after the attacks Osama bin Laden was accused, along with Saddam Hussein. bin Laden issued a press release in which he denied involvement in 9/11.
"I was not involved in the September 11 attacks in the United States nor did I have knowledge of the attacks. There exists a government within a government within the United States. The United States should try to trace the perpetrators of these attacks within itself; to the people who want to make the present century a century of conflict between Islam and Christianity. That secret government must be asked as to who carried out the attacks. ... The American system is totally in control of the Jews, whose first priority is Israel, not the United States."
Even the FBI has doubts about bin Laden's role in 9/11. When asked why the FBI's Most Wanted page on bin Laden did not list 9/11, the FBI replied,
"The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Usama Bin Laden’s Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11."
As of 27th April 2008, the crimes for which Osama bin Laden is wanted for, as listed on http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/terrorists/terbinladen.htm, are
Usama Bin Laden is wanted in connection with the August 7, 1998, bombings of the United States Embassies in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and Nairobi, Kenya. These attacks killed over 200 people. In addition, Bin Laden is a suspect in other terrorist attacks throughout the world.
It is argued by some that 9/11 is accounted for in the reference to 'other terrorist attacks throughout the world'. But I would argue that the United States and its allies went to war twice, have been at war for over six years, and approximately one million civilians have been killed in the process. Surely, you would need hard evidence to support such bloody and brutal action, and if so why is such hard evidence not given?
In late November 2007, Francesco Cossiga, the former President of Italy who exposed Operation Gladio, was interviewed by Italian newspaper Corriere della Sera. In that interview Cossiga stated
"[Bin Laden supposedly confessed] to the Qaeda September [attack] to the two towers in New York [claiming to be] the author of the attack of the 11, while all the [intelligence services] of America and Europe ... now know well that the disastrous attack has been planned and realized from the CIA American and the Mossad with the aid of the Zionist world in order to put under accusation the Arabic Countries and in order to induce the western powers to take part ... in Iraq [and] Afghanistan."
As shown above, the wars on Iraq and Iran are part of a Zionist strategy, as documented in A Clean Break and Rebuilding America's Defenses. There was a hint that Iran was involved in 9/11 in the Kean-Hamilton Report. There are hints that Iran has been supplying Iraqi insurgents with roadside bombs, killing and maiming American Army personnel. British sailors were sent without back up into disputed waters and captured by Iran, who claim the sailors were spying, a fact testified to by the captured Captain Chris Air. In this episode, Blair would not back down and risked escalating the dispute into military action when the USA decided to join in the sabre-rattling. Despite allegations that Iran is developing the bomb and is always supposedly only weeks away from achieving it, the IAEA has stated that it is satisfied that Iran is not developing the bomb. And how long has the USA had its significant fleet in the Persian Gulf on "exercises"?
Meanwhile the USA is pushing the idea of a missile defence system based in Poland and The Czech Republic, allegedly to defend America and her allies, i.e. Europe, from non-existent Iranian ballistic missiles. This is on top of the 'colour revolutions' in which former member states of the Soviet Union experienced revolutions to hand power to leaders friendly to the USA and NATO. And at the Tehran Conference in October 2007 Russian President Putin warned the USA that an attack on Iran would be seen as an attack on Russia. Iran also has a nuclear ally in China.
So with the USA fomenting revolution and war in Russia's sphere of influence, how far away are we from World War 3? How far can we push Russia and China before something really big, even if it is accidental, sparks a world war off?
But more importantly; who is the aggressor? and when did that aggression start?
In 1967 there was
We have seen in the section above on USS Liberty that Israel tried to drag a willing USA into its war against Egypt. If this had happened then it appears the USA was prepared to nuke Egypt at the first opportunity. Egypt was a client state of the USSR, and this would undoubtedly have sparked a nuclear World War 3. This scenario, with the USA fighting Communism in Vietnam, and fighting Israel's wars in the Middle East against an ally of the Soviets, sounds very similar to the scenario proposed by Albert Pike. So, was it all supposed to happen in 1967? There was an approximate twenty one year gap between the first and second world wars, and an approximate twenty one year gap between the end of world war 2 and 1967. Why would there be such a large gap between WW2 and WW3, assuming 1967 was not the first attempt? The suggestion that it was all supposed to happen in 1967 could also explain the choice of date which kicked off the current wars in the Middle East and the Caspian; 911. If it was supposed to happen in 1967 then "they" are over forty years late and counting! An emergency if ever there was one.
However, the way that similar forces are aligned over Iran today is not that far off either.