There are three sentences in the above quotation from Pike.
It is the aim of this chapter to show how each of these stages was implemented to satisfy stage 2 of Albert Pike's plan for three world wars by looking at each sentence of the above quotation and analyzing how it occured.
World War 2 had a similar basic structure to World War 1. Russia and the UK allied against Germany, and the USA joined in later. The two opposites, the Communist USSR and the Fascist Germany were created by Wall Street. They fought each other, and out of the carnage rose a world government financed by the same Wall Street bankers who had created the Communist USSR and the Fascist Germany in the first place.
But first, let's take a look at Franklin Delano Roosevelt, the man who dragged the USA into the war, for it is under his watch that his financiers and advisers created both Nazi Germany and Communist Russia.
"The money changers have fled their high seats in the temple of our civilization. We may now restore that temple to the ancient truths." - Inaugural Speech of FDR, 4th March 1933
"`Of course, it's just the thing for the Russians. They couldn't want anything better. Unconditional surrender,' he repeated, thoughtfully sucking his tooth. 'Uncle Joe might have made it up himself...'" FDR at the Casablanca Conference, 1943 (from 'As He Saw It' by Elliot Roosevelt)Who were these money changers that FDR referred to? Were they the same money changers who had financed him into The White House in the first place? Were they the same money changers who would profit very handsomely from the world war that FDR would drag the USA into by some false-flag terrorism that he engineered at Pearl Harbour? Yes, they were.
After some research on FDR I find him to be an enigma. On the one hand there is some very good evidence that FDR wanted to expose the corrupt banking system of the USA controlled by The Federal Reserve, destroy the British Empire and return national sovereignty to all nations and free them from the yoke of British imperialism. On the other hand, FDR virtually created the USSR through the Lend-Lease, with the knowledge of Stalin's genocidal purges and imposed famine on the Ukraine, and provoked and allowed the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbour that he then used to drag the USA into WW2. During WW2 FDR gave Stalin virtually whatever he wanted, including territory that was not his to give.
FDR came from a family with highly significant political and banking connections. From the Delano side, a Moreau Delano was a partner in Brown Brothers & Co. which amalgamated with Harriman & Co. to form Brown Brothers Harriman. This links FDR to Bush and the Nazis, as we shall see later. FDR's favourite uncle was Frederic Adrian Delano, who was appointed by Woodrow Wilson to the Federal Reserve Board in 1914. Frederic was also appointed to a number of positions involving social and/or environmental planning, e.g. in 1934 FDR appointed Frederic as Chairman of the National Resources Planning Board. Frederic was at this time also Chairman of the board of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, Virginia!
From the Roosevelt side, FDR's great-grandfather James Roosevelt founded The Bank of New York in 1784, and from 1786 to 1791 James was its President. In 1797 the Roosevelt & Son investment bank was formed, which was still operational in the 1930's, with FDR's cousin George E. Roosevelt as its chief. Another FDR cousin was Theodore Roosevelt, who was financed by JP Morgan to split the Republican vote so that Woodrow Wilson would win the 1912 election. Wilson then created the Federal Reserve.
Indeed, FDR was so aware of the financial shenanigans that he wrote
"The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the larger centers has owned the Government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson, and I am not wholly excepting the Administration of W.W. The country is going through a repetition of Jackson's fight with the Bank of the United States, only on a far bigger and broader basis." - President Franklin Delano Roosevelt to Col. Edward Mandell House, November 21, 1933, F.D.R.: His Personal Letters (New York: Duell, Sloan and Pearce 1950), p. 373.
FDR was also intimately connected to 120 Broadway and persons therein, which has been identified by Antony Cyril Sutton as the centre of manipulation that brought us the Federal Reserve, Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia.
FDR was financed into The White House in 1932 by Wall Street. Antony C Sutton in "Wall Street and FDR" shows that FDR received the lion's share of donations from Wall Street, although Wall Street financed both sides. In the previous 1928 election Wall Street financed the candidate who supported the New Deal ideals. Sutton's thesis is that FDR's New Deal was not FDR's idea, but was a reworking of ideas proposed by Wall Street favourite Bernard Baruch, and by Gerard Swope of General Electric in the Swope Plan. The New Deal allowed the corporate socialists in Wall Street to assume more control of the American economy.
In the first years of FDR's presidency he appears to have gone after the money changers he referred to in his inaugural speech of 4th March 1933, quoted from above. Ferdinand Pecora was appointed by the Senate Banking Committee, with FDR's approval, to investigate Wall Street, in particular the Morgan banking apparatus. Morgan was a Rothschild agent, and a significant force in The Federal Reserve system. Pecora did a good job in grilling JP Morgan Jr. After exposing Morgan, Pecora then went after Kuhn, Loeb & Co., another force in the Federal Reserve system. But then at about the same time as this Pecora investigation, Major General Smedley Butler was asked to lead a fascist takeover of the American government by a group of military veterans financed by Morgan. Butler was good friends of FDR, and eventually blew the whistle on this proposal after pretending to go along with the plan in order to find out who was behind it. The Banking Committee then began to investigate Butler's claims. The Committee eventually found that Morgan and his allies had indeed planned a fascist takeover of the White House. So if FDR was really going after the money changers to "restore that temple to the ancient truths", this Banking Committee report was all the evidence he needed. So what did FDR do? Nothing! Nobody was prosecuted, and the basic American banking system stayed the same, i.e. the Federal Reserve system was left untouched, so the top money changers stayed in their seats, and FDR continued to borrow from them and plunge America into even more debt to them. Butler gradually moved away from FDR and began to accuse FDR of rearming for another war.
On 16th November 1933 FDR formally recognised the USSR. This recognition formally opened up the market in the USSR to the Americans. An informal relationship between the USA and the USSR had been in existence since 1917, and before FDR came to power when a large deal was struck between the USSR and W. Averell Harriman in 1928 for Harriman to be the chief organizer of a huge engineering program to modernize Soviet heavy industry. Harriman was the US Ambassador to the USSR between 1943 and 1946. In 1944 Harriman reported to the State Department a conversation he had wth Stalin, in which
"Stalin paid tribute to the assistance rendered by the United States to Soviet industry before and during the War. Stalin said that about. Two-thirds of all the large industrial enterprises in the Soviet Union has been built with the United States' help or technical assistance."
In the summer of 1941 Churchill and FDR met at Argentia, Canada for the Atlantic Conference, to discuss the purposes of a war against Nazi Germany. The first three points of the charter that was agreed were
In October 1942, 10 months after Pearl Harbour, the FDR US Government began to shut down all Nazi banking operations in the USA, just a little too late don't you think? These included four businesses managed by Prescott Bush, the grandfather of the current President of the USA, George W Bush. Those businesses were
During world war 2 FDR ordered the assassination of Chinese leader Chiang Kai Shek in 1943, which General Joseph Stilwell did with a plan for the plane carrying Chiang to crash, but FDR did not give the final "execute" signal. FDR did not invite Chiang to Yalta in February 1945 to discuss post-war arrangements, so that FDR, Stalin and Churchill gave strategic parts of China to the USSR, including Manchuria, without Chiang's consent. At an earlier conference in Cairo in December 1943, FDR had assured Chiang that the USA would support Chinese national sovereignty after the war.
So why was FDR so generous to the USSR?
FDR's chief advisor was Harry Hopkins. In the Venona interceptions Hopkins was identified as Agent 19, a KGB agent who had originally been recruited in 1937 as a GRU agent. Other Soviet agents were Harry Dexter White, who was number 2 at the Treasury, and Alger Hiss, who was number 2 at the State Department and architect of the United Nations. Another was Lauchlin Currie who had worked with White and was FDR's personal aide, given the task of administering the executive. Currie secured positions for communists within FDR's administration, and managed to get a communist sympathiser Owen Lattimore appointed as FDR's advisor to Chiang Kai Shek, who was opposed to the communists in China!
Perhaps the Butler plot convinced FDR that the British Empire and Fascism had to be destroyed, which would require significant American-Russian cooperation, even if that meant aiding a mass murderer such as Stalin. Perhaps there was more to it. In 1841 FDR's cousin Clinton Roosevelt published "The Science of Government Founded on Natural Law", in which he proposes a collectivist society run by a small self-appointed elite who had absolute control. Hmm. Sound familiar? FDR's New Deal and the structure of society proposed by Clinton do sound very similar. Clinton was a member of the Columbia Lodge of the Illuminati established in 1785. FDR never qute made it to the top in Freemasonry. He was a 32nd degree Freemason, but was made the first Honorary Grand Master of the Order of De Molay.
Regarding FDR's apparent desire to destroy the British Empire, I would like to propose the following. At the time of WW2, the British Empire was the largest in the world. If another empire was to arise from WW2 then the British Empire had to be destroyed. A similar modus operandi happened during the transition of power from the Dutch Empire to the British Empire. That new empire could be the American, or the Soviet, or both. Removing British influence across the world would open up large regions of the world to be taken over by this or that opposing ideology, and thus for continuous conflict, both psychological and physical/military.
So that is how FDR came to occupy The White House, and some of what happened during his occupancy. He had the bankers at his mercy, but let them go. They then financed and armed Hitler (see subsequent sections) without any major protest or investigation by FDR, until it was way too late. FDR appointed, was surrounded and was advised by Soviet agents, despite receiving warnings to that fact. He formalised American assistance to the USSR and virtually gave them everything, including the bomb, through the Lend-Lease Program. He provoked and allowed an attack by Japan on Pearl Harbour, though Soviet agents were instrumental in advising on FDR's policy, and he then used the engineered bloodshed to drag the USA into a world war against Japan, a key Soviet aim. At Yalta, FDR gave Chinese land and people away to Stalin that were not his to give, despite his earlier promises to Chiang Kai Shek and the third point of The Atlantic Charter. As will be shown later, FDR could have shortened the war considerably on several occasions, particularly in 1943, and thus saved us all from the bomb, saved millions of civilian lives, including Jewish lives, thus reducing the probability of Israel being created and all the war and terrorism it has since brought to this world due to its barbarism.
"This is no peace. This is only a truce for twenty years!" - Lord Curzon commenting on the Treaty of VersaillesUpon the death of World War 1 the world powers met at Versailles, near Paris, France, to discuss what to do next. Millions of men, women and children had died, and billions of profit had been made. The leaders of 32 nations attended the peace conference, but it was dominated by "The Big Three", who were Great Britain, France and the USA. The Treaty of Versailles, which apportioned blame, reassigned territory, placed restrictions on the armed forces of Germany, and demanded war reparations from Germany, was suggested and partially agreed. Germany had only a short time to read and accept the proposed treaty, and reluctantly signed because its armed forces were virtually non-existent and it could not afford to continue war. The main article of the treaty which Germans were angry about was Article 231 which assigned blame for starting the war to Germany. As such Germany was then bound for war reparations, which were valued at £6,600 million (in 1919 money). The previous chapter World War 1 shows without doubt who should be blamed for starting the war; Great Britain and Freemasonry. Germany also lost 13% of its pre-1914 territory, its colonies were awarded to the League of Nations, and its Army was restricted to 100,000 men with virtually no navy or air force.
It was this treaty that Adolf Hitler pointed to time and again as the cause of the economic state of post-war Germany. Hitler blamed the Jews. Hitler was a Corporal in the German Army and was angry with the betrayal of Germany by the Communists who he considered were controlled by the Jews. He joined the German Workers Party, became its leader and changed its name to the National Socialist German Workers' Party, or The Nazi Party. He was arrested during the Beer Hall Putsch in Munich in 1923, an attempt at revolution against the Communist government. While in prison for this he wrote Mein Kampf, in which Hitler publicly declared his hatred and mistrust of Jews. Regarding Jewish control of Communism, most of the leaders of the early Bolshevik state were Jewish. Numerous foreign intelligence reports also state that most of the leaders of the Bolsheviks were Jewish exiles, many of whom were from the Lower East Side of New York. But to blame and persecute to extinction a whole religion based on the actions of a small percentage of that religion is unacceptable.
Did Hitler have a point about "the Jews"? Yes and no. Regarding the Treaty of Versailles, "The Big Three", Great Britain, France and the USA, were all under the control of the Rothschilds. All three nations had privately-owned central banks controlled by Rothschild.
"There are some people who seriously doubt that Johann Georg Hiedler was the father of Alois. Thyssen and Koehler, for example, claim that Chancellor Dollfuss had ordered the Austrian police to conduct a thorough investigation into the Hitler family. As a result of this investigation a secret document was prepared that proved that Maria Anna Schicklgruber was living in Vienna at the time she conceived. At that time she was employed as a servant in the home of Baron Rothschild. As soon as the family discovered her pregnancy she was sent back to her home in Spital where Alois was born. If it is true that one of the Rothschilds is the real father of Alois Hitler, it would make Adolf a quarter Jew. According to these sources, Adolf Hitler knew of the existence of this document and the incriminating evidence it contained. In order to obtain it he precipitated events in Austria and initiated the assassination of Dollfuss. According to this story, he failed to obtain the document at that time since Dollfuss had secreted it and had told Schuschnigg of its whereabouts so that in the event of his death the independence of Austria would remain assured. Several stories of this general character are in circulation" - Walter C Langer, The Mind of Adolf Hitler, p.107
This is highly significant because as we will see shortly, Stalin was not without a strong Rothschild connection.
The Treaty of Versailles economically destroyed Germany so that
Hitler was "the chosen one", and he began to receive help from very interesting circles.
The Nazis did poorly in elections during the 1920's and in 1928 the Nazis were on the verge of bankruptcy. But in the 1932 elections, after a strong campaign in which Hitler could suddenly afford to fly around Germany on a whistlestop tour, the Nazis won 37% of the vote making them the largest party in the Reichstag. The winner of that election President Paul von Hindenburg was forced to offer Hitler a position in government after the Nazis managed to win a vote of no confidence in the Chancellor Heinrich Brüning because Brüning's economic policy was thought to be too communist, and on 30th January 1933 Hitler was made Chancellor of Germany.
So who bankrolled the Nazis and their 1932 election campaign? Hitler received substantial political funding from businessmen with very strong connections to Wall Street, called The Keppler Circle. IG Farben was perhaps the greatest single donator to Hitler's slush fund, but there were others. We will see who created and controlled IG Farben later. There is a very intruiging and controversial book published in 1933 called Hitler's Secret Backers by a 'Sidney Warburg' who claims to have met with Hitler on several occasions and represented a consortium of Anglo-American Bankers, including the Rockefellers and Warburgs, who wanted to fund Hitler's political ambitions and lust for control of Germany in return for Hitler, on gaining power, implementing an "aggressive foreign policy". This Hitler did during the rest of the 1930's. And as shall be shown below the Anglo-American bankers did not disappoint Hitler from their side of the agreement, for it was they who bankrolled the creation of the war-and-blood-thirsty Nazi state.
What may have attracted these financiers to Hitler were the first three points of the Nazi Party manifesto issued in 1920. These were;
The Treaty of Versailles limited Germany's armed forces, but Great Britain, wittingly or unwittingly, allowed Hitler to expand his navy well over that agreed by the Treaty of Versailles. Hitler declared that the day on which this was agreed with Great Britain was the happiest day of his life. Hitler also wanted the return of the territory reassigned by the Treaty of Versailles. In March 1936 Hitler took control of the de-militarized zone of the Rhineland. But this was not enough. Hitler then wanted to reunite all the German speaking people, and annexed Austria in 1938. Hitler then looked across the border with Czechoslovakia and saw even more German speaking people and threatened war unless the Sudetenland in Czechoslavakia could be annexed. The Prime Minister of Great Britain Neville Chamberlain flew to Munich to meet with Hitler and the leaders of France and Italy, and all agreed in the Munich Pact that Hitler could annex the German-speaking part of Czechoslovakia, but no more. So Hitler took control of the Sudetenland, but violated the agreement and occupied most of Czechoslovakia, with the remainder becoming Slovakia, Germany's ally. The next target for Hitler was the city port of Danzig, which had been given to the state of Poland established by the Treaty of Versailles. Poland was landlocked and Danzig, and a corridor of former German land linking Danzig with Poland, allowed Poland access to the seas. Due to Hitler's violation of the Munich Pact both Great Britain and France threatened war if Germany invaded Poland. Hoping to appease the Soviets a treaty between Hitler and Stalin was agreed, in which Poland would be shared between the two should Hitler invade Poland. This pact would keep Stalin on Hitler's Eastern front happy so that Germany could focus all its effort on its Western front should France and Great Britain declare war against Germany for invading Poland. On September 1st Germany invaded Poland, and on September 3rd Great Britain declared war on Germany.
This is the sequence of events we are familiar with that led to World War 2. But how, after its defeat in World War 1, with the subsequent outrageous reparations it was forced to pay, and the severe military restrictions imposed on it by the Treaty of Versailles, did a broken and battered Germany rise from its ruins to become such a threat to the world?
And what opposition was there to Hitler, particularly in Jewish circles?
A few days before the 27th March demonstration, the headline of the 24th March 1933 edition of The Daily Express was 'Judea Declares War on Germany - Jews of All the World Unite - Boycott of German Goods - Mass Demonstrations', and the text stated
ALL Israel is uniting in wrath against the Nazi onslaught on the Jews in Germany. Adolf Hitler, swept into power by an appeal to elemental patriotism, is making history of a kind he least expected. Thinking to unite only the German nation to race consciousness he has roused the whole Jewish people to a national renaissance. The appearance of the Swastika symbol of a new Germany has called forth the Lion of Judah, the old battle symbol of Jewish defiance. Fourteen million Jews dispersed throughout the world have banded together as one man to declare war on the German persecutors of their co-religionists. Sectional differences and antagonisms have been submerged in one common aim - to stand by the 600,000 Jews of Germany who are terrorised by Hitlerist anti-Semitism, and to compel Fascist Germany to end its campaign of violence and suppression directed against its Jewish minority. World Jewry has made up its mind not to rest quiescent in face of this revival of medieval Jew-baiting. Germany may be called on to pay a heavy price for Hitler's antagonism to the Jews. She is faced with an International boycott in commerce, finance, and ministry. She may find herself in spiritual and cultural isolation, recoiling before the burning crusade that Jews of all lands are launching in defence of their afflicted brethren. The Jewish merchant prince is leaving his counting-house, the banker his board-room, the shopkeeper his store, and the pedlar his humble barrow a holy war to combat the Hitlerist enemies of the Jew.
CONCERTED ACTION
Plans for concerted Jewish action are being matured in Europe and America to strike back in reprisal at Hitlerist Germany. In London, New York, Paris, and Warsaw, Jewish merchants are uniting for a commercial crusade against Germany Resolutions are being taken throughout the Jewish business world to seve trade relations with Germany. Large numbers of merchants in London have resolved to stop buying German goods, even at the cost of suffering heavy loss. Similar action is being taken throughout the United States. Mass meetings in New York and other American cities attended by hundreds of thousands of indignant Jews, have called for a wholesale boycott of German goods. In Poland the trade embargo on Germany is already in operation. In France a proposed ban on German imports is being widely canvassed in Jewish circles. A concerted world boycott by Jewish buyers is likely to involve grave damage to the German export trade. Jewish merchants all over the world are large buyers of German manufactured goods, chiefly cotton goods, silks, toys, electrical fittings, and furniture. A meeting of the Jewish textile trade in London has been called for Monday to consider the situation and to determine what steps should be taken in regard to Germany.SHIPPING THREAT
Germany is a heavy borrower in foreign money markets, where Jewish effluence is considerable. Continued anti-Semitism in Germany is likely to react seriously against her. A move is on foot on the part of Jewish financiers action to stop. Germany's Transatlantic shipping traffic is likewise threatened. The Bremen and the Europa, the German crack liners, may suffer heavily from a Jewish anti-German boycott. Jewish trans-ocean travellers from an important part of the patrons of these liners because of their extensive part in international trade. The loss of their patronage would be a heavy blow to Germany's Atlantic trade. World-wide preparations are being made to organise great Jewish demonstrations of protest to call attention to the sufferings of the German Jews at the hands of the Hitlerites, and to demand action to stop German anti-Semitism. The whole of American Jewry has been roused to an unprecedented heat of indignation agents Germany. A rabbinical decree in New York has made next Monday a day of fasting and prayer over the Hitler campaign. Fasting will begin on Sunday at sunset and finish at sunset on Monday. All Jewish shops in New York will be closed on Monday during a parade. Apart from a monster meeting in Madison Square Garden, meetings are to be held in 300 American cities. Madison Square Garden will see the remarkable sight of Bishop Manning peaking from a Jewish platform appealing for an end of the Hitler "terror". Every Rabbi in the City of New York has been placed under a scared obligation by Rabbinical decree to devote Saturday's sermon to the plight of the Jews in Germany. The "New York Times" this morning says a list of a thousand German immigrations who have come to the United States during recent years has been compiled by an overseas Nazi organisation, the object being to use these people for Nazi propaganda in the United States.SPECIAL SESSION
The organisation of Jewish youth in Britain is organising demonstrations in London and the provinces during the week-end. The Board of Deputies of British Jews, representing the entire Jewish community in Great Britain, is meeting in special session on Sunday to discuss the German situation and decide on what action is to be taken to counteract the attacks on their German fellow Jews. Members of the American House of Representatives are introduction resolutions protesting against the anti-Jewish express in Germany. The American trade unions, representing 3,000,000 workers, have also decided to join in the protests. Representative Jewish organisations in the European capitals are understood in to be making representations to their respective Governments to use influence with the Hitler Cabinet to induce it to call a halt in the oppression of the German Jews. The old and reunited people of Israel are rising with new and modern weapons to fight this age old battle with their persecutors.
Before the 24th March Daily Express story, and the 27th March demonstration, Hitler had not made any moves against the German Jews. But both of these, this declaration of war and the small boycott, with other inflammatory and provocative statements, provoked Hitler into a direct reaction against Jews. Many Jews lost their jobs, and shops owned by Jews were forced to close. This should have persuaded German Jews to get out of Germany. They did, but not to Palestine, as some may have hoped, and despite a transfer agreement between the Zionists, Nazi Germany and Great Britain.
So the 'boycott Nazi Germany' movement was very carefully and successfully managed by the Warburgs etc. A small boycott did go ahead, which had limited impact but it did drive Hitler into reacting against German Jews. This reaction of Hitler was then used to demonise Hitler, for until then Hitler had not implemented any real anti-Jewish policies, and Jews in Germany were actually not that bothered about Hitler. A large scale, fully international boycott, that if implemented could have destroyed Nazi Germany and thus any plans for a second world war, did not go ahead. Thus Nazi Germany was rebuilt and re-armed for world war, while Hitler was provoked into some sort of direct action against German Jews which was used to demonise him and further isolate Germany. Not that I am defending Hitler, but this, with the evidence showing his rise to power, shows the way in which he was, wittingly or unwittingly, manipulated.
There are also questions to ask of the Holocaust, such as
IG Farben came to dominate the German chemical industry, and with Vereinigte Stahlwerke came to dominate the munitions industry producing 95% of Germany's explosives in 1937/8. IG Farben would collaborate with Standard Oil of New Jersey to produce synthetic oil which was absolutely essential for Germany's war effort because Germany had no oil reserves and would either need to import oil, which is not good in wartime, or make it from something else.
IG Farben was formed in 1925 by Hermann Schmitz. It was a conglomerate of the already operating companies Badische Anilin und Soda Fabric (BASF), Bayer, Agfa, Hoechst, Weiler-ter-Meer and Griesheim-Elektron. By 1928 it had acquired several US companies, including Winthrop Chemical Co., which it reorganized into IG Chemie based in Switzerland, and then they all merged into the American IG Chemical Corporation in 1929. On the board of American IG in 1930 were a number of Americans. They were;
Of note is the presence of three directors of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, including Paul Warburg who was the architect of the Federal Reserve system. Paul Warburg's brother Max sat on the board of IG Farben in Germany. It must be remembered that Max sent Lenin into Russia in 1917. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York was considered the most powerful bank in the USA because it had the most power within the Federal Reserve system. Why would THREE of its directors want to direct the American subsidiary of a German chemical corporation? One of the German directors was Max Ilgner, the nephew of IG Farben creator Hermann Schmitz, who also sat on the board of American IG. Ilgner ran the Berlin NW7 office of IG Farben, which was the key Nazi overseas espionage centre and housed the economic intelligence unit of the Wehrmacht.
Also of note is the presence of Edsel B Ford of Ford Motors. In 1928 Ford in Germany merged with IG Farben. Henry Ford was admired so much by Hitler that Ford was awarded the Grand Cross of the Supreme Order of the German Eagle. This was the highest honour that could be bestowed by Germnay on a non-German. Ford was the first American to receive the award. One of the three previous recipients was Benito Mussolini. During WW2 Ford of France and Ford of Germany supplied Germany with trucks and parts, while Ford's factory in the Soviet Union supplied the USSR with trucks, and Ford plants in the USA supplied the Allies with trucks. This is the classic "help all sides and control who wins" scenario.
But who controlled these Wall Street firms mentioned thus far?
The Keppler Circle was a group of German businessmen who financed Hitler's rise to power. SS chief Heinrich Himmler was to influence and protect the Keppler Circle shortly after Hitler was made absolute dictator of Germany in 1934, and it became known as Himmler's Circle of Friends. The original Keppler Circle was siginificantly connected to Wall Street. Board members of the German subsidiaries of ITT, General Electric and Standard Oil of New Jersey were in the circle, as well the Vice President of the Vereinigte Stahlwerke cartel that, as we saw above, was created by loans from Wall Street as part of the Dawes Plan.
In 1924 the Ethyl Gasoline Corporation was jointly owned by Standard Oil of New Jersey and General Motors. Its purpose was to control and utilize US patents for the manufacture and distribution of tetraethyl lead and ethyl fluid in the USA and abroad. These compounds eliminate knocking in both aviation and automobile engines, and improve the efficiency of engines so that they can be used in modern mobile warfare. Until 1935 the manufacture of such products was limited to the USA only. But then in 1935, for whatever reason, Ethyl Gasoline Corporation decided to transfer the manufacturing to Germany. The US War Department criticised the move because the demand for such products in Germany at the time was too small to be of interest, and it was also suspected that Germany was rearming and that ethyl lead would be a valuable aid to military warfare. The Army Air Corps advised Ethyl Gasoline Corporation that
"under no conditions should you or the Board of Directors of the Ethyl Gasoline Corporation disclose any secrets or 'know-how' in connection with the manufacture of tetraethyl lead to Germany".Ethyl Gasoline Corporation agreed, but then signed joint production agreements with IG Farben and also Montecatini of Italy! Archive files of IG Farben captured after World War 2 highlight this treasonous action. One particular file reads;
Since the beginning of the war we have been in a position to produce lead tetraethyl solely because a short time before the outbreak of the war the Americans had established plants for us ready for production and supplied us with all available experience. In this manner we did not need to perform the difficult work of development because we could start production right away on the basis of all the experience that the Americans had had for years.
But this is not the only example of Standard Oil of New Jersey helping Hitler. Germany had no significant oil industry. In 1934 85% of its finished petroleum products were imported. If Hitler wanted an "aggressive foreign policy" he would need access to siginificant quantities and reliable sources of oil. Standard Oil of New Jersey came to Hitler's rescue like a knight in shining armour!
During WW1 Germany had developed a process to produce synthetic oil from coal, but had not developed it on an industrial scale to produce the quantities required for a large scale war. Standard Oil of New Jersey gave IG Farben the patents for this process. Between 1926 and 1929 IG Farben and Standard Oil of New Jersey cooperated in producing oil from coal. Then in 1929 IG Farben and Standard Oil of New Jersey formed a new company called Standard IG Company to work on producing synthetic oil from coal. Most of the stock was owned by Standard Oil of New Jersey, and most of the work was done by and financed by Standard Oil of New Jersey, including the construction of three new oil-from-coal plants in the USA. All patents from this work were freely available to IG Farben. It was this technology that IG Farben used for its oil-from-coal factory at Auschwitz-Monowicz which fuelled the Wehrmacht.
Standard Oil of New Jersey was controlled by the Rockefellers, and had Pau Warburg, the architect of the Federal Reserve, on the Board of Directors. They also controlled to a degree the Federal Reserve and would thus benefit from any war involving the USA, because the US government had to get its money from the privately-owned Federal Reserve. The USA, and other countries, would require constant loans from the Federal Reserve, and other privately-owned banks owned and controlled by the Federal Reserve families, to keep fighting and fighting to hopefully win any war. During World War 2 the debt of the USA to the privately-owned Federal Reserve increased by 600%. So did the Rothschilds, Rockefellers and Warburgs etc. purposely create Hitler for war in order to generate massive war profits? It is very possible, and to me very probable, but it may also be just a side effect of the desired outcome of World War 2. For what should also be known is that as with the headquarters of the League of Nations, the Rockefellers donated the headquarters of the United Nations. So not only were war profits gained but also more control over the world through a world government established after the war they had financed!
Other American and Wall Street companies also assisted in the building and sustenance of the Wehrmacht.
"The [German electrical] industry has never been attacked as a basic target system, but a few plants i.e. Brown Boveri at Mannheim, Bosch at Stuttgart and Siemenstadt in Berlin, have been subjected to precision bombing raids; many others were hit in area raids."As a consequence AEG continued to increase its control of the Wehrmacht demand for electrical war equipment, such as radar. General Electric had a 30% stake in AEG. I shall quote Antony C Sutton here to explain how AEG managed to escape becoming a precision bombing target;
In 1936 Senator James A Reed of Missouri, an early Roosevelt supporter, became aware of Roosevelt's betrayal of liberal ideas and attacked the Roosevelt New Deal program as a "tyrannical" measure leading to despotism [and] sought by its sponsors under the communistic cry of 'Social Justice'." Senator Reed further charged on the floor of the Senate that Franklin D Roosevelt was a "hired man for the economic royalists" in Wall Street and the Roosevelt family "is one the largest stockholders in the General Electric Company."Is it possible that the war time President Franklin D Roosevelt was literally making a killing from World War 2 through GE's stake in AEG? This could explain why AEG factories were not targeted for precision strikes while AEG competition was targeted? This is just a very worrying thought. However, it has been shown that JP Morgan men like Owen Young and Gerard Swope were creating a cartel within the German electrical industry through AEG, then buying that cartel through GE, and then contributing significant amounts of money to Hitler's slush fund, and then making massive war profits from supplying the Wehrmacht with electrical equipment such as radar and starters.
"Herr Hitler openly boasts of Mr [Henry] Ford's support and praises Mr Ford as a great industrialist and a great anti-Semite. A photograph of Mr Ford hangs in Herr Hitler's quarters..."Hitler rewarded Henry Ford with the Grand Cross of the German Eagle on Ford's 75th birthday in 1938.
The following press release from the White House states that the world war was to stop Hitlerism. What the release fails to mention is that without Wall Street and The Federal Reserve there would have been no Hitler!
JOINT DECLARATION BY UNITED NATIONS Washington, D.C., January 1, 1942 White House news release DECLARATION BY UNITED NATIONS: A Joint Declaration by The United States of America, The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, China, Australia, Belgium, Canada, Costa Rica, Cuba, Czechoslovakia, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Greece, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, India, Luxembourg, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Norway, Panama, Poland, South Africa, Yugoslavia. The Governments signatory hereto, Having subscribed to a common program of purposes and principles embodied in the Joint Declaration of the President of the United States of America and the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland dated August 14th, 1941, known as the Atlantic Charter, Being convinced that complete victory over their enemies is essential to defend life, liberty, independence and religious freedom, and to preserve human rights and justice in their own lands as well as in other lands, and that they are now engaged in a common struggle against savage and brutal forces seeking to subjugate the world, Declare: (1) Each Government pledges itself to employ its full resources, military or economic, against those members of the Tripartite Pact and its adherents with which such government is at war, (2) Each Government pledges itself to cooperate with the Governments signatory hereto and not to make a separate armistice or peace with the enemies. The foregoing declaration may be adhered to by other nations which are, or which may be, rendering material assistance and contributions in the struggle for victory over Hitlerism. Done at Washington January First, 1942
So that is how Hitler was financed into power and how the Nazi Wehrmacht was deliberately armed for a long war. What about the USSR?
The Russian Revolutions of 1917 were covered in the chapter World War 1. Lenin and Trotsky were sent in by elements in Wall Street and The City of London. That is now undisputed fact. Would these powers have entrusted Lenin and Trotsky to "do the right thing" and obey their paymasters? Or would they have sent them in under the pretence they believed in their plight, but then have a guaranteed, trusted servant, for example Stalin, takeover, and eliminate all the original Bolsheviks in purges etc?
Lenin was the ruler of the Communist state until 1924, when Lenin died. Following Lenin's death, Stalin began to sieze power over a period of time, and turned on Trotsky, until Trotsky was eventually assassinated in Mexico in 1940. Stalin had been an employee of the Rothschilds. Simon Sebag-Montefiore in Young Stalin reports that Stalin was very excited with his employment by the Rothschilds, beginning in 1901. According to Sebag-Montefiore, Stalin and his thugs received Rothschild patronage and finance while Stalin was in Baku raising money for Lenin via murder, bank-robbery, blackmail and kidnapping. This relationship is recorded by Tsarist police and Bolshevik memoirists, and shines a completely different light on the help that Stalin received before, during and after FDR's Lend-Lease Program.
Antony C Sutton in National Suicide : Military Aid to the Soviet Union and The Best Enemy Money Can Buy describes how the United States, particularly under Franklin D Roosevelt, assisted the USSR, giving them technology and arms to create a superpower state very quickly (as happened with Nazi Germany and which was necessary for a fast approaching World War 2). Here are just two of the many examples of the assistance given to the USSR;
In May 1929 the Soviets signed an agreement with the Ford Motor Company of Detroit. The Soviets agreed to purchase $13 million worth of automobiles and parts and Ford agreed to give technical assistance until 1938 to construct an integrated automobile-manufacturing plant at Nizhni-Novgorod. Construction was completed in 1933 by the Austin Company for production of the Ford Model-A passenger car and light truck. Today this plant is known as Gorki. With its original equipment supplemented by imports and domestic copies of imported equipment, Gorki produces the GAZ range of automobiles, trucks, and military vehicles. All Soviet vehicles with the model prefix GAZ (Gorki Avtomobilnyi Zavod) are from Gorki, and models with prefixes UAX, OdAZ, and PAZ are made from Gorki components. In 1930 Gorki produced the Ford Model-A (known as GAZ-A) and the Ford light truck (called GAZ-AA). Both these Ford models were immediately adopted for military use. By the late 1930s production at Gorki was 80,000-90,000 "Russian Ford" vehicles per year. The engine production facilities at Gorki were designed under a technical assistance agreement with the Brown Lipe Gear Company for gear-cutting technology and Timken-Detroit Axle Company for rear and front axles. Furthermore, U.S. equipment has been shipped in substantial quantifies to Gorki and subsidiary plants since the 1930s — indeed some shipments were made from the United States in 1968 during the Vietnamese War. As soon as Ford's engineers left Gorki in 1930 the Soviets began production of military vehicles. The Soviet BA armored car of the 1930s was the GAZ-A (Ford Model-A) chassis, intended for passenger cars, but converted to an armored car with the addition of a DT machine gun. The BA was followed by the BA-10 — the Ford Model-A truck chassis with a mount containing either a 37-millimeter gun or a 12.7-millimeter heavy machine gun. A Red Army staff car was also based on the Ford Model-A in the pre-war period. During World War II Gorki produced the GAZ-60 — a hybrid half-track personnel carrier that combined the GAZ-63 chassis. In the late 1940s the plant switched to production of an amphibious carrier — The GAZ-46. This was a standard GAZ-69 chassis with a U.S. quarter-ton amphibious body. In the mid-1950s Gorki produced the GAZ-47 armored amphibious cargo carrier with space for nine men. Its engine was the GAZ-61, a 74-horsepower Ford-type 6-cylinder in-line gasoline engine — the basic Gorki engine. In the 1960s and 1970s production continued with an improved version of the BAZ-47 armored cargo carrier, using a GAZ-53 V-8 type engine developing 115 horsepower. In brief, the Ford-Gorki plant has a continuous history of production of armored cars and wheeled vehicles for Soviet army use: those used against the United States in Korea and Vietnam.[emphasis added] In addition to armored cars, the Ford-Gorki factory manufactures a range of truck-mounted weapons. This series began in the early thirties with a 76.2-millimeter field howitzer mounted on the Ford-GAZ Model-A truck. Two similar weapons from Gorki before World War II were a twin 25-millimeter antiaircraft machine gun and a quad 7.62-millimeter Maxim antiaircraft machine gun — also mounted on the Ford-GAZ truck chassis. During World War II Gorki produced several rocket-launchers mounted on trucks. First the 12-rail, 300-millimeter launcher; then, from 1944 onwards, the M-8, M-13, and M-31 rocket-launchers mounted on GAZo63 trucks. (The GAZ-63 is an obvious direct copy of the U.S. Army's 21/2-ton truck.) Also during World War II Gorki produced the GAZ-203, 85-horsepower engine for the SU-76 self-propelled gun produced at Uralmashzavod. (Uralmash was designed and equipped by American and German companies.) After World War II Gorki production of rocket-launchers continued with the BM-31, which had twelve 300-millimeter tubes mounted on a GAZ-63 truck chassis. In the late 1950s another model was produced with twelve 140-millimeter tubes on a GAZ-63 truck chassis. In the 1960s yet another model with eight 140-millimeter tube was produced on a GAZ-63 chassis. Finally, in 1964 Gorki produced the first Soviet wire-guided missile antitank system. This consisted of four rocket-launchers mounted on a GAZ-69 chassis. These weapons turned up in Israel in the late 1960s. The GAZ-69 chassis produced at Gorki is also widely used in the Soviet Army as a command vehicle and scout car. Soviet airborne troops use it as a tow for the 57-millimeter antitank gun and the 14.5-millimeter double-barrelled antiaircraft gun. Other Gorki vehicles used by the Soviet military include the GAZ-69 truck, used for towing the 107-millimeter recoilless rifle (RP-107), the GAZ-46, or Soviet jeep, and the GAZ-54, a 1 1/2-ton military cargo truck. In brief, the Gorki plant, built by the Ford Motor Company the Austin Company and modernized by numerous other U.S. companies under the policy of "peaceful trade," is today a major producer of Soviet army vehicles and weapons carriers.}
The Soviet T-34 and the modified T-34/85 were first introduced in World War II and used extensively against Americans in the Korean War. The model was later used in the Hungarian revolt and in "wars of liberation" to the present day. The T-34 is an excellent design and a formidable weapon. It emphasizes the ability of the Soviets to design weapons while still dependent on the West for production facilities and basic technical advances. In 1931 the Russians bought two Christie tanks from the U.S. Wheel Track Layer Corporation in the United States. The Russians copied these, built Christie tanks, and then incorporated the Christie suspension system into the T-34. The first Russian Christies had the same engines as the U.S. Christie — a Liberty 12-cylinder V-type of 338 horsepower with forced-water cooling. In the 1920s the Chase National Bank of New York (now Chase Manhattan) attempted to arrange illegal export of large quantities of these Liberty engines to the Soviet Union at the price of $2,000 each. In any event, the T-34 incorporated the Christie suspension from the United States, but generally used a 500-horsepower V-type diesel developed from the German B.M.W. diesel engine. The T-34/85 was the T-34 with significantly increased firepower. Ball bearings on the T-34 and T-34/85 were manufactured on Swedish equipment. The welding work on the T-34 was at first immensely crude, but as The Welding Engineer (Dec. 1952) pointed out: "The T-34 was designed with one idea in mind — to provide firepower. Any humanitarian considerations, like protection of the crew, are purely secondary." The original T-34s were built from several million tons of armor-plate imported from the United States. In July 1934 Henry Disston & Sons, Inc. requested War Department permission to accede to a Soviet request, "in training their technicians to make tank armorplate of the same quality as they now make for this Government" (Russia 400.114, War Office). The T-34 was followed by the improved T-44 and then by the T-54, with the basic T-44 chassis and using Christie-system torsion-bar suspension. This was the standard Soviet tank until recently; it was used in the Hungarian revolt in 1956, in South Vietnam in 1972, and still in use in most Warsaw Pact countries. The Red Army has always used diesel engines in its medium and heavy tanks. This tank-engine series is the V-2 and V-12 water-cooled, rated to 550 brake horsepower (bhp) at 2,150 revolutions per minute (rpm). According to Ogorkiewicz, the original Russian water-cooled V-12 engine was a successful diesel adaptation of contemporary aero-engine designs. Used on all Soviet medium and heavy tanks up to World War II, it was a large 2,860 cubic-inch engine, based on a German B.M.W. aircraft design, and developed about 500 bhp. Soviet em-ephasis on diesels has continued since World War II, while other Soviet armored vehicles have used automobile gasoline engines. The T-70 light tank uses two GAZ-202 70-horsepower engines from the Ford-Gorki plant. The SU-76 self-propelled gun also used two engines of the same Ford type geared together. The Soviets have continuously developed the same engine for their battle line tanks including the T-34, T-44, T-54, T-62 and T-72. These engines originated with a Hispano Suisa engine originally developed in the 1930s as an aircraft engine. The latest T-62s are manufactured in three gigantic plants at Nizhny Tagil, Omsk and Kharkov. It has a power displacement of 9.93 kw/liter, a mean piston speed at maximum rpm of 12.6 m/s for the left bank and 13.1 m/s for the right bank. The BMEP at maximum torque is 698 kPz. The weight to power ratio is 2.6 kg/kw. The weight/displacement is 25.8 Kg per liter and the specific fuel consumption is 210 g/kwh. The Soviets prefer not to use imported parts for field military end uses. However, they do reverse engineer the latest advances in Western military technology obtained by illegal purchase or espionage. Examples are the gunner's telescope on the T-62 which uses the same multi roundscales and movable index line found on the M-46s (U.S.) T-152 co-axial telescope. The T-64 and the T-72 has an analogue ballistic computer and a coincidence rangefinder comparable to those found on U.S. M-48 and M-60 tanks. These were probably obtained from U.S. equipment captured in Vietnam.
Sutton also documents in much more detail the economic development of the USSR from 1917 to 1965 in a trilogy Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development. Basically, we built the genocidal and tyrannical USSR, before, during and after World War 2.
The question is; why?
Why was such a power created by Wall Street and The City of London?
We went to war with Germany to save Poland, didn't we? So why did Great Britain not do anything for six months? And why were Poland and Eastern Europe given to the USSR at the end of WW2?
The Phony War was named so due to the lack of military conflict for the first six months following the declaration of war on Germany by Great Britain. Germany was left alone to do whatever it wanted to do in Poland. Why? If the British were so keen to defend Poland why was virtually nothing done to protect it? Was this so that the horrors of the Holocaust, leading to the psychological blackmail to create Israel, could be enacted, for without the persecution of the Jews of Poland there would be no Israel? After Germany had overwhelmed Poland it turned its attention to France and began to push into Northern France driving back the British Expeditionary Force towards a town on the coast called Dunkirk. This force was at the mercy of the Panzers, but Hitler allowed the British to escape. Why? According to B.H. Liddell Hart, Hitler wanted to make peace with Britain. Hart was told by General Blumentritt that Hitler spoke to members of Field Marshal Gerd von Rundstedt’s staff at the time of the evacuation at Dunkirk, and that
"Hitler was in a very good humor, he admitted that the course of the campaign had been ‘a decided miracle,’ and gave us his opinion that the war would be finished in six weeks. After that he wished to conclude a reasonable peace with France, and then the way would be free for an agreement with Britain. He then astonished us by speaking with admiration of the British Empire, of the necessity for its existence, and of the civilization that Britain had brought into the world. He remarked, with a shrug of the shoulders, that the creation of its Empire had been achieved by means that were often harsh, but ‘where there is planing, there are shavings flying.’ He compared the British Empire with the Catholic Church, saying they were both essential elements of stability in the world. He said that all he wanted from Britain was that she should acknowledge Germany’s position on the Continent. The return of Germany’s lost colonies would be desirable but not essential, and he would even offer to support Britain with troops if she should be involved in any difficulties anywhere. He remarked that the colonies were primarily a matter of prestige, since they could not be held in war, and few Germans could settle in the tropics. He concluded by saying that his aim was to make peace with Britain on a basis that she would regard as compatible with her honor to accept."
So Hitler did not want war with Great Britain, only to be recognised as the major power on the continent. Hitler also wanted to form an alliance to defeat Communism. However Hitler's peace treaty with Great Britian did not materialize, and six weeks after Dunkirk "the Battle of Britain" commenced as the Luftwaffe tried to bomb the airbases on the Southern Coast of Great Britain in preparation for an invasion.
In May 1941 Rudolf Hess flew to Scotland to meet with The Duke of Hamilton. Only a few days before this flight Hess held a private four hour meeting with Hitler which nobody else was allowed to attend. However, during this meeting the words "Albrecht Haushofer" and "Duke of Hamilton" were overheard. Haushofer was a leader of the movement within Germany trying to secure pece with Great Britain. Hess proposed to form a peace with Great Britain, return the Nazi-occupied countries to their people and Germany would even pay for their reconstruction, but Great Britain had to join Germany in its war against Communist Russia. This offer was refused, and Hess was locked up for the war, tried at Nuremberg and found guilty, and lived the rest of his life in a cell at Spandau.
If we look at Pike's plan for World War 2, Pike suggests that by the end of World War 2 Communism should be very powerful. If Great Britain and the Nazis had allied against Communist Russia, the plan may have been in jeopardy. But fear not! We cannot trust Churchill. He was a Rothschild gimp, as well as a senior Freemason. His refusal to accept an offer of peace from Hitler satisfied Pike's plan in the defeat of the Fascists and the expansion of Communism. This will be shown later in the refusal to accept the suggestions of Abwehr Chief Admiral Canaris to shorten the war. The Nazis were but pawns. They were created by the City of London/Wall Street axis-of-evil, allowed to expand, and when the Nazis had enough manpower and natural resources and confidence from the policy of appeasement they declared war on him to kickstart a longer and bloodier war than World War 1 so that a world government would be accepted after the bloodshed and not rejected like the aborted League of Nations. That League of Nations failed because the USA rejected it. The USA had to be brought into the war so that it would fight and lose many, many men and be 'persuaded' that a world government was required. The question was, how could the USA be brought into the war?
"What I want you and the Prime Minister to know is that I shall at all times welcome it, if you will keep me in touch personally with anything you want me to know about. You can always send sealed letters through your pouch or my pouch."Kent began to intercept a number of communications between President Franklin D Roosevelt (who signed the communications as POTUS = President Of The United States) and somebody calling themselves 'Former Naval Person' within the British government, and kept a copy of these strange communications. Over time Kent began to suspect that 'Former Naval Person' was Winston Churchill, and that Churchill was avoiding the proper channels of communication and going behind the back of Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain. The tone of these communications indicated that Roosevelt and 'Former Naval Person' wanted Chamberlain out of office and 'Former Naval Person' as Prime Minister. 'Former Naval Person' once replied to a communication by POTUS with,
"I am half American and the natural person to work with you. It is evident that we see eye to eye. Were I to become Prime Minister of Britain we could control the world."It was only when Churchill became Prime Minister that Churchill used his real name as a signature in these communications. From these communications Kent believed that FDR was determined to get the USA into the war. Churchill told FDR that the British were seizing German ships in US waters and intercepting the mail of US soldiers and citizens, thus completely ignoring and violating America's neutrality. "The Phony War" was broken by a plan, the raid on Norway, hatched between FDR and Churchill through these communications, designed to entice the German fleet out of dock. America, although still neutral, helped to inform the Nazis of the British plan. It was this event that led to the eventual replacement of Chamberlain with Churchill as PM, as FDR and Churchill had plotted. Kent made contact with a number of Russian emigrés under surveillance and eventually met Captain Archibauld Ramsay, MP for Peebles. Kent wanted Ramsay to tell American politicians about FDR's plan to get the USA into the war. Kent was soon arrested by British Special Branch. His diplomatic immunity was waived by US Ambassador to Great Britain Joseph P Kennedy, father of JFK, and Kent was imprisoned for the rest of the war on charges of espionage. Ramsay was imprisoned for most of the war under Regulation 18b along with hundreds of others who knew or suspected the war had been planned.
The event that eventually brought the USA into the war was the attack on Pearl Harbour. In January 1941, almost a year before Pearl Harbour, FDR sent his advisor Harry Hopkins to London with a message, that,
The President is determined that we shall win the war together. Make no mistake about it. He has sent me here to tell you that at all costs and by all means he will carry you through, no matter what happens to him--there is nothing that we will not do so far as he has human power.
Despite America's neutrality FDR supplied Great Britain and Russia through convoys over the Atlantic, in the Lend-Lease Program, hoping to encourage an attack on the US fleet by Germany, and thus giving the USA a reason to join the war. But Germany didn't bite. So FDR turned his attention to Japan, as Churchill had suggested to him. A series of agreements was reached between the USA, Great Britain and The Netherlands that should Japan move south beyond a line 100' East and 10' North, or even threaten British or Dutch possessions in the South West Pacific, then the USA would join the war against Japan, despite Japan not firing one bullet at the USA. This was known as the ABCD agreement. In early 1941 Japan had sought talks with the USA to iron out their differences, and even offered to leave the Axis in return for a guaranty of peace with the United States, but each time the USA refused. In July 1941 FDR ordered the seizure of all Japanese assets in the USA, and ordered a trade embargo on Japan, which the British and the Dutch joined, thus increasing the probability of provoking Japan into doing something for the ABCD agreement to be enforced.
On 7th December 1941, "a date that will live in infamy", Japan did something. It attacked Pearl Harbour.
The Pearl Harbour attack has been depicted in two well known films, "Tora! Tora! Tora!" and more recently "Pearl Harbor" in 2001, the year of the 9/11 attack. Both show the Japanese as evil warmongerers who fell upon a Pearl Harbour in complete surprise. This is the myth that has still survived today, despite numerous revisionist investigations by concerned authors and govermental bodies. The truth about Pearl Harbour is that
Winston Churchill himself also knew of the impending attack and failed to warn Pearl Harbour, although he did warn FDR on 29th November 1941. Why? It was he who suggested to FDR that he provoke Japan and not Germany.
An article in The New American entitled Pearl Harbor: The Facts Behind the Fiction by James Perloff published in June 2001 raises more questions about who knew what and when about the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. Perloff focuses on the research of Robert B. Stinnett, a World War 2 Navy veteran. Stinnett found that FDR's plans to provoke Japan began with a report by Lieutenant Commander Arthur H. McCollum, head of the Far East desk of the Office of Naval Intelligence, which listed eight actions which McCollum believed would provoke Japan into attacking the USA. FDR implemented all eight and more. The Commander of the Pacific Fleet Admiral J.O. Richardson flew to Washington DC to protest to FDR the decision to base the Pacific fleet at Pearl Harbor and not on the West Coast. Pearl Harbor was known to be hard to defend. But Richardson was sacked and replaced by Admiral Husband E. Kimmel who accepted the base at Pearl Harbor, and also trusted that he would be informed of any intelligence relating to any attack. Unknown to Kimmel Japan's "Purple" code had been broken, and copies of deciphered intercepts in this code were sent to FDR, and the Secretaries of State, War and Navy, as well as the Army Chief of Staff General George Marshall and the Chief of Naval Operations, Admiral Harold Stark. The decoding machines for this cipher were alloted to Great Britain, and requests from Kimmel for a decoding machine for Pearl Harbor were rejected.
You may wonder how the Japanese strike fleet managed to sail undetected from Japan to Hawaii. It was detected...by the US Navy! Captain Johann Ranneft, the Dutch naval attache in Washington DC, who was awarded the Legion of Merit for his services to America, recorded revealing details of this knowledge in his diary. On December 2nd 1941, he visited the Office of Naval Intelligence and inquired about the Pacific. An American officer, pointing to a wall map, said, "This is the Japanese Task Force proceeding East." It was a spot midway between Japan and Hawaii. On December 6th, Ranneft returned and asked where the Japanese carriers were. He was shown a position on the map about 300-400 miles northwest of Pearl Harbor. Ranneft wrote: "I ask what is the meaning of these carriers at this location; whereupon I receive the answer that it is probably in connection with Japanese reports of eventual American action.... I myself do not think about it because I believe that everyone in Honolulu is 100 percent on the alert, just like everyone here at O.N.I.". On 25th November 1941, and just one hour after the Japanese fleet set sail for Pearl Harbor, all US, Allied and even Russian shipping was ordered not to sail in the North Pacific, and was instead diverted through the South Pacific via the Torres Strait. This was done, according to Rear Admiral Richmond K. Turner, the Navy's War Plans officer, to clear the path for the Japanese fleet so it would not be seen by any merchant shipping which may have alerted Pearl Harbor! Kimmel was also told by intelligence to look South West and not North, from whence the Japanese came. Kimmel, sensing diplomatic relations were at crisis point, put the Pacific Fleet out to sea. FDR ordered them back to Pearl Harbor.
Kimmel did receive a warning, on 27th November, about a possible Japanese attack, but the named potential target was not Pearl Harbor, it was the Phillipines. Kimmel was advised to protect against sabotage, and so the fighter planes were bunched together, which made them easier targets for Japanese bombers.
At every point Kimmel was denied real intelligence, and the actions he took which could have protected the Pacific Fleet and/or Pearl Harbor itself were rescinded by FDR, until the Japanese were bombing Pearl Harbor and it was too late.
Kimmel took the blame. FDR and Churchill got their war.
The day after the attack on Pearl Harbour, Franklin Roosevelt spoke before the Congress;
Yesterday, December 7, 1941 - a date which will live in infamy - the United States of America was suddenly and deliberately attacked by naval and air forces of the Empire of Japan. The United States was at peace with that nation and, at the solicitation of Japan, was still in conversation with its Government and its Emperor looking toward the maintenance of peace in the Pacific. Indeed, one hour after Japanese air squadrons had commenced bombing in Oahu, the Japanese Ambassador to the United States and his colleague delivered to the Secretary of State a formal reply to a recent American message. While this reply stated that it seemed useless to continue the existing diplomatic negotiations, it contained no threat or hint of war or armed attack. It will be recorded that the distance of Hawaii from Japan makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks ago. During the intervening time the Japanese Government has deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace. The attack yesterday on the Hawaiian Islands has caused severe damage to American naval and military forces. Very many American lives have been lost. In addition American ships have been reported torpedoed on the high seas between San Francisco and Honolulu. Yesterday the Japanese Government also launched an attack against Malaya. Last night Japanese forces attacked Hong Kong. Last night Japanese forces attacked Guam. Last night Japanese forces attacked the Philippine Islands. Last night the Japanese attacked Wake Island. This morning the Japanese attacked Midway Island. Japan has, therefore, undertaken a surprise offensive extending throughout the Pacific area. The facts of yesterday speak for themselves. The people of the United States have already formed their opinions and well understand the implications to the very life and safety of our nation. As Commander-in-Chief of the Army and Navy, I have directed that all measures be taken for our defense. Always will we remember the character of the onslaught against us. No matter how long it may take us to overcome this premeditated invasion, the American people in their righteous might will win through to absolute victory. I believe I interpret the will of the Congress and of the people when I assert that we will not only defend ourselves to the uttermost but will make very certain that this form of treachery shall never endanger us again. Hostilities exist. There is no blinking at the fact that our people, our territory and our interests are in grave danger. With confidence in our armed forces - with the unbounded determination of our people - we will gain the inevitable triumph - so help us God. I ask that the Congress declare that since the unprovoked and dastardly attack by Japan on Sunday, December seventh, a state of war has existed between the United States and the Japanese Empire.
Curtis Dall, the son-in-law of FDR, published a book entitled, FDR ; My Exploited Father-in-Law, in which Dall recalls certain occasions during the time FDR was alive and either working towards becoming President or occupying The White House. Dall also relates an interview he had with Kimmel in which Kimmel tells his side of the story. Kimmel is 100% innocent.
Dall also relates an interview with an US Navy officer Commander George Earle in which Earle alleges that FDR also refused offers to stop the war early, thus saving the lives of millions.
Admiral Canaris was head of Abwehr, German Intelligence, and was the man who tried to stop Hitler from destroying Germany by assassination or by other means. Canaris also met with the head of British Intelligence, Menzies, and the head of the American OSS, Bill Donovan, in Santander, Spain, in the summer of 1943. Canaris offered Menzies and Donovan a deal. Canaris would trick Hitler into flying into the open and welcoming arms of the Allies. In return Canaris wanted the return of the German monarchy. Menzies and Donovan welcomed the suggestion and took it to Churchill and Roosevelt. But Churchill and Roosevelt refused the offer, stating they wanted the utter destruction of Germany. As a result many more British, American and German men and women, soldiers and civilians, died, including the Jews of Europe. Why was this offer refused?
Eddie Chapman was in jail in Jersey when the Nazis invaded the island. He was recruited by Abwehr, and was parachuted into Britain in December 1942. Upon landing in Britain he immediately defected to MI5. Chapman offered to blow Hitler up at a Nazi rally. Chapman believed his Abwehr handler, "Dr Graumann", real name Stephan von Gröning, would be able to get Chapman a seat close enough to Hitler to do the job. So why was this offer refused?
According to an article in The Times of 9th January 2007 entitled "The spy who offered to blow up Hitler on a suicide mission" which reported on newly released archives,
Professor M.R.D. Foot, the distinguished historian of the Second World War, believes that the decision may have sprung from a number of factors, including a longstanding government policy against assassinating foreign heads of state, and mistrust of Chapman, a notorious jailbird.
This is such a lame excuse, but the decision not to let Chapman attempt the assassination fits well with the thesis set forth in this work. Hitler was more valuable alive because he was continuing the war and killing Jews.
Chapman may well have succeeded in killing Hitler because as the same article in The Times states,
The new evidence suggests that the German spymaster “Dr Graumann”, whose real name was Stephan von Gröning, may have been deliberately setting Chapman up as an assassin. Like many Abwehr officers, he was secretly a bitter opponent of Hitler. His offer to smuggle Chapman into a Nazi rally suggests he knew what Chapman had in mind, and that the two men may have been in league.
As stated in the chapter on Israel, it is now known that Zionists in Great Britain and the USA refused to either accept a homeland other than Palestine, or pay a ransom for the Jews to Hitler. The fact remains that the most powerful Zionists had the power to pay the requested ransom because they own the banks which operate a system which allows them to create virtually unlimited quantities of money out of nothing (see chapter Money. Money. Money)!!
Franklin D Roosevelt signed Executive Order 9417 Establishing the War Refugee Board(WRB) on 22nd January 1944. This was done almost two years after the State Department had confirmed reports of genocide against Jews. During its relatively short life the WRB saved the lives of an estimated 200,000 refugee Jews fleeing Nazi persecution. The WRB was formed at the request of Henry Morgenthau Jr., FDR's Secretary to the Treasury,
There is a debate over whether the Allies could and should have bombed not only Auschwitz, but all the other known concentration camps of Nazi Germany. David Wyman presented his argument that the Allies could and should have bombed Auschwitz in his book The Abandonment Of The Jews: America and the Holocaust. One of the persons accused of taking the decision not to bomb is John J McCloy, who was FDR's Assistant Secretary of War. McCloy took this decision without undertaking any feasibility study, and although heavy bombers had successfully bombed targets just a few miles away from Auschwitz, McCloy stated that the heavy bombers that he thought would be required to execute any operation to bomb Auschwitz or the railway lines feeding it would not reach Auschwitz and would be vulnerable to attack. McCloy later told Henry Morgenthau that the final decision not to bomb was taken by FDR. So who was McCloy? Nicknamed "Chairman of the American Establishment", here is a brief list of McCloy's roles;
He is truly an insider. This is the man who argued that Auschwitz etc. could not and should not be bombed.
So the Jews were left to die in death camps, in fields, in graves they dug for themselves at gunpoint before being shot in the head etc. I suspect that the war was allowed to continue (see Churchill's refusal to ally with Hitler against Communism and the rejection of Admiral Canaris' offers above) in order for Israel to be created. Israel, or rather the initial Jewish settlements in Palestine, was funded by the Rothschilds. The Rothschilds were leaders of the Zionist movements which refused to support a boycott of Hitler's Germany (this was done through the Rothschild agents the Warburgs), but who also rejected the offers from Hitler to ransom the Jews. The Rothschilds are the major stockholders in The Federal Reserve, which is basically a giant money-creating machine in private hands. One has to ask why the Rothschilds were prepared to fund WW2 through the Federal Reserve, but not pay out the ransom (which was not that great considering the cost of the war) to save thousands if not millions of Jews. However at the end of the war the holocaust was used by the Zionists as emotional blackmail to request a Jewish homeland in Palestine. That request was rejected, so they took it by force anyway. This may well have been part of the plan anyway, for the Holocaust to convince international Jewry that it needed a Jewish homeland, so that after the Holocaust and having their request to settle in Palestine en masse being rejected, many Jewish Zionists and their supporters would take Palestine by force, to create even more friction and anger than that caused due to the immigration before WW2.
I believe Israel is the key. The anger caused by Israel within the Islamic world is well understood across the world, and the clash of civilizations resulting from the Islam v Zionism battle due to not only Israel's existence, but the way in which it was created, is potentially devastating to the world. I cannot understand why the USA would support Israel so much. It is a piece of hot, dusty, rocky land. Why go to the trouble of allowing millions of your fellow Jews to be murdered by Nazi Satanists for that? I can't see a logical reason, except that Israel is part of a plan which requires a state of Israel, to encourage and sustain a world war between Islam and Zionism. Immigration could also be part of that plan, for then the potential for a home-grown fifth column of Islamic fundamentalists is realized, who can either commit acts of terrorism, be they known of in advance or not, or be blamed for acts of synthetic/false-flag terrorism. This puts the indigenous populations into a war mentality; fearful, obedient, servile and easy to manipulate into ceding privacy and civil rights.
There was at least one winner from World War 2; Communism. Although the Communists controlled a large mass of land, they were not that powerful or technologically advanced. World War 2 changed all that.
The attack on Japan with the atomic bomb was completely unnecessary. This attack was part of a plan suggested by Bertrand Russell to scare the living shit out of the world with the threat of a nuclear war.
In order for the UN to become a power, a threat would be required so that the war-weary people of the world would gradually cede more and more power to the UN. That threat was the threat of nuclear war. The world had to be shown what wars of the future could be like, and told that only the UN could save the world from such a catastrophe (without being told that the same people who arranged and financed the two world wars were the same people suggesting the UN should control the world). So Japan's offer of a ceasefire was refused and an outrageous ultimatum was issued to Japan. Japan refused, and was nuked. After the nukes were dropped the ceasefire terms initially offered by Japan, which were initially refused by the USA and UK and lead to the nuking, were then accepted!! There can only be one reason for this refusal; to give an excuse for the atomic bomb to be dropped to show the world what wars of the future will be like if we don't cede sovereignty to a one world government. Hence we now have the USA threatening nuclear first-strike in preemptive wars to defend itself and its allies.
A few years after the end of WW2 the USSR detonated its first atomic bomb. How did the USSR get "the bomb"?
In order to continue to terrify the world into ceding more and more power to the United Nations the threat of another war was required. Now that the first nuclear bombs had been used the next war would probably involve the use of such weapons of mass destruction. The problem was, the USA had the bomb, but the USSR didn't. As stated above the Soviet Union was built in and by the West. The British and Americans supplied material and finance to the USSR into a potential world power.
They also gave them the bomb!!
Major George Racey Jordan was in the United States Air Force during World War 2, and served at Great Falls, Montana and Newark Airport, New Jersey. During the war there was an agreement between the USSR and the USA called Lend-Lease. This program was requested by President FDR so that Great Britain could receive American-manufactured goods on virtually give-away terms while the USA was still neutral. But soon the USSR was at FDR's door asking for aid too, indicating that Japan may be preparing to invade the USSR. So FDR extended the Lend-Lease Program to include the USSR. It was Major Racey's job to oversee the transfer of the American-manufactured goods to the USSR at Great Falls and Newark. In 1952 he published his diaries, simply entitled Major Jordan's Diaries. Major Jordan noted in his diaries that in 1942 Newark Airport was called United Nations Airport No. 8, and that while he was Supply Expediter and Liaison Officerat Great Falls the United States Army Air Force designated him "United Nations Representative", even though the UN was still years away from being created! In his diaries Jordan details the transfer of the fruits of the Manhattan Project, the research which produced the atomic bomb. Here is the complete list of Lend-Lease shipments which as liaison officer, he was able to see and copy. This shows all the chemicals, metals and minerals suitable for use in an atomic pile which were transferred:
beryllium, cadmium, cobalt ore and concentrate (33,600 lbs), cobalt metal and cobalt-bearing scrap (806,941 lbs), uranium metal (2.2 lbs), aluminum tubes (12,766,472 lbs), graphite (7,384,482 lbs), thorium, uranium nitrate, oxide and urano-uranic oxide, aluminum and alloys (366,738,204 lbs), aluminum rods (13,744,709 lbs), aluminum plates (124,053, 618 lbs), brass and bronze ingots and bars (76,545,000 lbs), brass or bronze wire (16,139,702 lbs), brass and bronze plates (536,632,390 lbs), insulated copper wire (399,556,720 lbs),
These lists also include the "purely postwar Russian supplies", such as:
an oil-refinery plant, forging machinery and parts ($53,856,071), lathes, precision boring-machines, canning machinery, commercial dairy equipment, sawmill machinery) textile machinery, power machines (60,313,833), foundry equipment, electric station equipment, telephone instruments and equipment, radio sets and equipment ($52,072,805), 9.594 railway freight cars, 1,168 steam locomotives ($101,075,116), merchant vessels ($123,803,879), motor trucks ($508,367,622),
Among the major donations obviously intended to strengthen the Soviet Union industrially after the war, Major Jordan's records include:
one repair plant for precision instruments ($5450,000), two factories for food products ($6,924,000), three gas generating units ($21,399,000), one petroleum refinery with machinery and equipment ($29,050,000), 17 stationary steam and three hydro-electric plants ($273,289,000).
To add to all this virtually-free equipment totalling billions of dollars, the USSR was even given a printing press with which to print US dollars to pay the USA for the goods it had received as part of the Lend-Lease! The man in charge of the Lend-Lease Program to the USSR was Harry Hopkins, who we met earlier during The Bolshevik Revolution when he saved the pro-Bolshevik journalist John Reed from execution. Hopkins was FDR's man and virtually No. 2 in the USA after FDR. Hopkins was later found to be a top Soviet agent.
On 23rd September 1949 the USSR detonated its first atomic bomb. Major Jordan immediately contacted Senator Bridge which resulted in TV interviews, an investigation by the FBI and two congressional investigations, in December 1949 and March 1950. The revelations of Major Jordan were the precursor to the McCarthy Hearings, run by Senator Joseph McCarthy.
To add to this, it is also suspected that the Rothschilds also helped in giving the USSR the bomb by reporting British research into nuclear weapons. "The Fifth Man" is the term used to describe the unknown member of the famous Cambridge spy ring. The four we know are Kim Philby, Donald Maclean, Guy Burgess and Anthony Blunt. The identity of The Fifth Man was revealed in 1994 in a book of that name by Roland Perry. It was Lord Victor Rothschild. Perry interviewed the spy ring's handler Colonel Yuri Modin, and wrote
"According to ex-KGB Colonel 'F' and Modin, Rothschild was the key to most of the Cambridge ring's penetration of British intelligence. 'He had the contacts,' Modin noted. 'He was able to introduce Burgess, Blunt and others to important figures in Intelligence such as Stewart Menzies, Dick White and Robert Vansittart in the Foreign Office, the Permanent Under-secretary of State in the Foreign Office, who controlled MI-6."
Guy Liddell, director of MI5's B division, appointed Lord Victor Rothschild as head of security, thus giving Rothschild total access to all buildings and all materials and all research. Rothschild would act as a spy, gather the intelligence he wanted, pass it on to the ring, and occasionally inform establishments of a security breach. Thus Lord Victor Rothschild was able to learn the secrets of British research into nuclear and biological weapons and pass them onto the USSR. After the war Lord Victor Rothschild continued to spy for the Soviets, which betrays the argument that he was doing it all to help an enemy of the Nazis to build the bomb first. He appointed himself the special liaison to the Atomic Energy Commission, which was looking to using atomic energy for peaceful and military objectives.
Lord Victor Rothschild also passed on intelligence about British feelings and military to the Zionist terrorists trying to create Israel by blowing up and attacking Palestinians and the British Army. He was also instrumental in financing and passing nuclear secrets to the Israeli Weizmann Institute researching nuclear weapons, for which Rothschild was made Honorary Fellow of the Institute.
Marshall was appointed Army Chief of Staff on 1st Spetember 1939, at the request of FDR, a decision that pleased Harry Hopkins, FDR's right hand man, and thus number 2 in the USA. Hopkin's was later identified as a top Soviet agent. Throughout WW2 Marshall was FDR's chief military adviser. FDR was building the Communist state through the Lend-Lease program, which was managed by Harry Hopkins. Marshall had been promoted to Army Chief of Staff from the rank of General with no combat experience while he was Assistant Chief of Staff in charge of War Planning. With this decision FDR promoted Marshall over 20 Major-Generals and 14 senior Brigadiers, all of whom had much more experience and knowledge than Marshall.
It was a Soviet desire for a war between the USA and Japan. Japan was camped on Chinese soil in order to stop Communist expansion eastward. The USSR hoped that with a war between the USA and Japan, Japan would be weakened and pose no obstacle to Communist expansion into China. In the autumn of 1941 with the USSR fighting Nazi Germany, and with Japan allied with the Nazis, it was feasible that Japan could attack the USSR. By taking on Japan, the USA would stop Japan attacking the USSR so that 200,000 seasoned Soviet troops could move to the other side of the Soviet empire to fight the Nazis in the coming winter during Operation Barbarossa. On 26th November 1941, Secretary of State Cordell Hull issued a ten point ultimatum to Japan. One of the points was that Japan should withdraw from China. Eight of those points came directly from Hopkins, including the demand for withdrawal from China. On 6th December 1941, a message from Japan to its embassy in Washington was intercepted by the United States military indicating that Japan was about to declare war. Marshall left his office as soon as this message was intercepted, and did not return to his office until 1125 on the 7th. Upon arriving at his office he insisted on reading the message in full, and took his time recognising the significance of it. All officers in Marshall's office discussed the message and all agreed that it indicated an attack on US forces in the Pacific by Japan at 1pm that same day. Marshall decided not to immediately inform Pearl Harbour by the scrambler telephone on his desk, or by the Navy radio system, or through the FBI network. Instead, Marshall telegraphed the information by Western Union to San Francisco and then by RCA Commercial Radio to Honolulu, and it was not marked "priority". Due to Marshall's deliberate actions, Pearl Harbour received this information several hours after the attack had finished.
At the Tehran Conference it was decided, at Marshall's insistence, that the advance towards Berlin through Italy should stop, and significant troop numbers should transfer to an invasion of Southern France, called Operation Anvil. To Churchill's credit, he argued that the Allies should push on towards Berlin and occupy the Balkans. Marshall's argument resulted in a lengthening of the war, giving Stalin the Balkans, and many thousands of Allied soldiers losing their lives in battles fought against the refreshed, reinforced and rearmed German soldiers under General Kesselring. The man in charge of the Italian campaign in 1943 General Mark Clark wrote in his memoirs,
Yet, I believe our mission was fulfilled and, save for a high-level blunder that turned us away from the Balkan states and permitted them to fall under Red Army control, the Mediterranean campaign might have been the most decisive of all in postwar history.
Following the successful landing of hundreds of thousands of Allied military personnel on the beaches of Normandy in 1944, the Allies began to make progress towards to Berlin. It is believed that if the Allies had gone full steam ahead then they could have easily captured Berlin months before it fell and ended the war early. However, this slow progress allowed the Russian forces to take Eastern Europe. Dwight D Eisenhower had been appointed Supreme Allied Commander in Europe in December 1943, and led this campaign into Europe. Eisenhower had been assistant to Marshall in Washington.
33rd Degree Freemason President Harry Truman sent Marshall to China in 1945 to sort out the civil war in China, which he did, by giving Chinese Communists more power than Chiang Kai-Shek.
The Marshall Plan, or the European Recovery Program, was proposed by Marshall in 1947. There was significant opposition to such a proposal, but the Communist coup in Czechoslovakia changed the minds of American politicians. Greece and Turkey were the first recipients of aid. The leaders of the plan were Marshall, Paul G. Hoffman, and Averell Harriman. The Harrimans have been mentioned several times already and their complicity, witting or unwitting, is beyond doubt, so a discussion on Averell is not necessary. Hoffman was president of the Ford Foundation from 1950 to 1953, a member of Bilderberg, an influential member of The Council on Foreign Relations, and was Managing Director of the United Nations Special Fund, which gave him the power to decide which projects received aid from the fund. Hoffman also established The Committee for Economic Development with several other CFR members. This led to the establishments of movements for European unification as a bulwark against Communist expansion into Europe, and the creation of the Bilderberg group.
So here we see Marshall fulfilling two parts of Pike's plan; empowering Communism by giving China to the Communists, but also keeping Communism in check in Europe by pouring billions of dollars of aid into the war-ravaged nations of Europe via The Marshall Plan (ERP).
For his endeavours to the cause, Marshall was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1953.
Marshall is less studied in conspiracy theory, but he played a significant operational role in advancing the plan.
At the Yalta Conference, February 1945, Freemason Churchill, Freemason FDR, and Freemason Stalin, literally Bretheren-in-arms, discussed how to carve up the world. Through FDR's wartime Lend-Lease program, FDR had empowered the Soviet state. And at Yalta Russia was given Eastern Europe. These acts fit well with the Pike plan to expand Communism during World War 2. We went to war with the Nazis to liberate Poland and the other Easter European states that Hitler had invaded, and at Yalta gave them to genocidal dictator Stalin instead after the Allies had made extremely slow progress towards Berlin allowing the Russians to drive towards Berlin themselves and take it and thus Eastern Europe first!
The agreements reached at Yalta were published on 24th March 1945. They included
Curiously the leader of China, Chiang Kai-shek was not invited to Yalta, and yet there were Freemasons Stalin, Churchill and FDR giving Stalin some Chinese territory and control over the strategic Manchuria.
However, on 16th March 1955, the real decisions made at Yalta were released. According to Phyllis Schlafly in her column Bush Buries The Shame Of Yalta published 18th May 2005, they included
At Yalta, Stalin requested portions of China in return for joining the Pacific War against Japan. But by the time the conference at Yalta was held, Japan was well on the way to defeat so there was actually no need to concede to Stalin's request to encroach on China. In fact, Japan had already made attempts to negotiate surrender. It was George Marshall who, wittingly or unwittingly, failed to inform FDR of this situation in the Pacific, thus leading to FDR conceding to Stalin's demands at Yalta regarding China. The USSR belatedly joined the Pacific war during its last days.
"Operation Keelhaul" betrays what we went to war for. This operation was kept secret for fifty years. It implemented the secret concessions made to Stalin at Yalta. Millions of refugees in the Allied zones seeking freedom from the Communists were forcibly transported to the USSR. Men, women and children, Cossacks, anti-Communists, and Nazi collaborators were sent back to the USSR. Julius Epstein, author of a book on this betrayal which is simply entitled Operation Keelhaul wrote;
"That our Armed Forces should have adopted this term as its code name for deporting by brutal force to concentration camp, firing squad, or hangman's noose millions who were already in the lands of freedom, shows how little the high brass thought of their longing to be free."
The Chinese Civil War had been on going for over two decades by the end of World War 2. Mao Tse-tung was leader of the Chinese Communist Party wanting revolution, and Chiang Kai-shek was the leader of the Chinese government opposing Mao. Chiang had been led to believe at the Cairo Conference 1943 that China would be given its autonomy in return for fighting with the Allies. The USA sent General George C Marshall to negotiate a peace between the two. We have just met Marshall in a previous section. Marshall tried to persuade Chiang into allowing Mao and the Communists into the Chinese government, but Chiang refused. A trade embargo was then placed on Chiang's government, resulting in Chiang gradually being unable to supply his army in their fight against the Communists. On the other hand, Mao was being supplied by the Russians, who had been, and at the time were still, receiving aid from the USA via the Lend-Lease program! The unnecessary nuking of Japan led to the Communists also suddenly receiving a large cache of weapons confiscated from the Japanese who were on Chinese soil at the time of their surrender. The Communists eventually won, and so began The Cultural Revolution and The Great Leap Forward, in which tens of millions of Chinese died due to famine brought on by central planning.
The Reece Committee was created to investigate the tax-exempt foundations in the USA, such as those controlled by Rockefeller. Their summary of findings reported,
During the period 1945 to 1949, persons associated with the Institute of Pacific Relations were instrumental in keeping United States policy on a course favorable to Communist objectives in China. Persons associated with the IPR were influential in 1949 in giving United States far eastern policy a direction that furthered Communist purposes.
So what was the Institute for Pacific Relations? According to the insider Carrol Quigley, he wrote in Tragedy and Hope
In 1951 the Subcommittee on Internal Security of the Senate Judiciary Committee, the so-called McCarran Committee, sought to show that China had been lost to the Communists by the deliberate actions of a group of academic experts on the Far East and Communist fellow travelers whose work in that direction was controlled and coordinated by the Institute of Pacific Relations (IPR). The influence of the Communists in IPR is well established, but the patronage of Wall Street is less well known.
The IPR was a private association of ten independent national councils in ten countries concerned with affairs in the Pacific. The headquarters of the IPR and of the American Council of IPR were both in New York and were closely associated on an interlocking basis. Each spent about $2.5 million dollars over the quarter-century from 1925 to 1950, of which about half, in each case, came from the Carnegie Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation (which were themselves interlocking groups controlled by an alliance of Morgan and Rockefeller interests in Wall Street). Much of the rest, especially of the American Council, came from firms closely allied to these two Wall Street interests, such as Standard Oil, International Telephone and Telegraph, International General Electric, the National City Bank, and the Chase National Bank. In each case, about 10 percent of income came from sales of publications and, of course, a certain amount came from ordinary members who paid $15 a year and received the periodicals of the IPR and its American Council, Pacific Affairs and Far Eastern Survey.
The financial deficits which occurred each year were picked up by financial angels, almost all with close Wall Street connections. The chief identifiable contributions here were about $60,000 from Frederick Vanderbilt Field over eighteen years, $14,700 from Thomas Lamont over fourteen years, $800 from Corliss Lamont (only after 1947), and $18,000 from a member of Lee, Higginson in Boston who seems to have been Jerome D. Greene. In addition, large sums of money each year were directed to private individuals for research and travel expenses from similar sources, chiefly the great financial foundations.
So who was Jerome D. Greene? Greene as an employee of the Rockefellers and their foundations, a member of the Reparations Committee at the Paris Peace Conference, and involved in the establishment of The Council on Foreign Relations. The Lamonts were associated with JP Morgan. The Lamonts and Vanderbilt Field were significantly involved in the American Communist scene, e.g. Corliss Lamont was Chairman of the Board, and chief incorporator of The National Council on American-Soviet Friendship.
So George C Marshall (CFR) and the financiers of the CFR via the IPR helped China go 'red'.
It may well be that FDR was manipulated into the Lend-Lease Program. If we look at the situation he found himself in, Hitler and Nazism had gradually grown and he saw them as a threat to the world should they takeover the European mainland. The USSR had a very large population, but was ill-equipped to fight the Nazis. From the Tyler Kent case, we know FDR was keen to drag the USA into the war. And from the actions he took leading to the Pearl Harbor attack we know he was desperate to get the USA into the war.
But then, why did FDR not stop the war in 1943 so that the Germans would be able to concentrate on fighting Communism? Why did FDR not protest the 1932/3 Ukraine famine?
FDR appears to be more of a Communist sympathiser, and he may well have been manipulated and put into a position in which he felt he had to force a Pearl Harbor attack to bring a sceptical American public around to his way of thinking, and also create the Lend-Lease Program to arm the USSR against the Nazis. He was also advised by Soviet agents who withheld information and advised him to follow pro-Soviet policies. Did he select these advisers himself? Were they forced upon him? Was he advised into appointing them? If so, by whom?
If I had been so suspicious of the Federal Reserve system, as FDR appears to have been in 1934, then I would have replaced it. And when the Nazis began to grow, and statements were made in Congress that the Federal Reserve was financing them, then I would have investigated. FDR did neither. As a consequence, Nazi Germany was allowed to grow unhindered, and then crushed in a world war that led to FDR's financiers in The Federal Reserve and Wall Street gaining much more power, and placing America more in debt to them.
To me there is no doubt that someone in the corridors of power wanted the USSR to grow and gain more power, but also keeping it in check so it did not grow too powerful. Whether FDR was in on the plot, and used World War 2 as an excuse to give the USSR everything I don't know. But not only did his financiers create Nazi Germany, they financed the Russian Revolutions, and also gave Eastern Europe and China to the Communists.
Both of these organizations were marketed as the solution to a devastated world economy following the war. Most of the power went to the USA, which was in turn financed by...the privately-owned central bank The Federal Reserve.
Developing nations eventually found themselves at the mercy of the IMF. In return for financial assistance their natural resources had to be signed over to American or European corporations. Crops that had fed generations were taken out of their countries, so the people had little to live on.
So the UN implements population control policies on a global scale, while the IMF forces poor nations to sign their natural resources over.
With China having gone 'red', the Communists looked at Korea. The USSR joined the Pacific War, just as America was about to nuke Japan, and invaded North Korea which was occupied by Japan. The Soviets pushed the Japanese down to the 38th Parallel, where the Japanese surrendered. The Soviets remained occupying North Korea, and negotiations began between the USA and the USSR on how Korea would be governed. The Communists in the North wanted Kim Il-Sung to govern, while America wanted Syngman Rhee to govern in the South. Skirmishes between the two occured along the 38th Parallel for several years.
But then on 25th June 1950, Kim, with Stalin's support, invaded the South, and over a few days drove the ill-equipped South Koreans back. A UN resolution was quickly passed calling for the North Koreans to withdraw back to the 38th Parallel. They replied by claiming the conflict was a civil war, and was thus outside the scope of the UN. A number of nations, under the UN banner, began sending troops and equipment to South Korea, but it was the USA who supplied the bulk of these. The President of the USA at the time was Harry Truman, 33rd Degree Freemason, member of the Council on Foreign Relations, supporter of Israel and the man who unnecessarily dropped the bomb on Japan, i.e. an insider. Gradually, the North Koreans were driven back into North Korea, almost to the border with China. With the South Koreans and USA rapidly advancing towards China, the Chinese joined in to defend the North Koreans and drove the USA back towards the 38th Parallel, where over the next two years the fighting remained, with peace talks in the background. The war ended on 27th July 1953.
Thus, an overt Communist expansion was rolled back. Why? After all the manipulation to turn China over to the Communists, why fight for several years to block Communist expansion into Korea?
The USA agreed with France that they would both resist Communism in South East Asia. 'The Domino Theory' of Communism made certain factions within the USA very paranoid. South East Asia was slowly going 'red'. In their eyes it had to be stopped, and in doing so this kept Communism in check, and made the American government more indebted to The Federal Reserve while it spent hundreds of billions of dollars on military contracts.
President John F Kennedy was about to withdraw from Vietnam when he was assassinated. Kennedy was not a Freemason, but his successor Lyndon B Johnson was, albeit still an Entered Apprentice. It is a common occurence that a non-Freemasonic President is either forced out of office, e.g. due to a scandal, or is assassinated, to be replaced by a President who is a Freemason.
The incident that is considered as the cause of the Vietnam War was the Gulf of Tonkin Incident. It was reported that on the 4th August 1964 the USS Maddox came under attack from a handful of small Vietnamese boats. We now know that such an event did not happen. But Johnson was told by his Defence Secretary Robert McNamara that the event did occur. Johnson reported to Congress that American ships had come under attack from Vietnamese boats. The media ran fawning editorials on Johnson's speech, thus spreading the rumour of an unprovoked attack by Communst Vietnamese forces that must be responded to. Johnson subsequently ordered air bombing raids on North Vietnamese targets in retaliation. On the 7th August Congress passed the Tonkin Gulf resolution which gave Johnson carte blanche to fight the Vietnamese Communists. Thus began the escalation.
No formal declaration of war was made. A minor conflict gradually escalated into a major war that lasted ten years, and also spilled over into neighbouring countries. In the early years of Johnson's administration McNamara urged Johnson to escalate the conflict, continually promising swift victory at little cost. But somehow McNamara always got it wrong.
So who was Bob McNamara?
McNamara was a very intelligent man. He saved Ford Motors, and became the first non-member of the Ford family to be Ford Motor's President. He quit that position to become JFK's Secretary of Defense, and under Johnson gradually dragged the USA into Vietnam. McNamara was a member of The Council on Foreign Relations, The Trilateral Commission and Bilderberg. Not many people are a member of all three of these secretive, powerful organizations, and this membership puts him in the same power league as David Rockefeller and Henry Kissinger, and suggests that he was a major manipulator. In return for dragging the USA into the Vietnam War, McNamara was made President of the World Bank from 1968 to 1981. A similar honour was given to Paul Wolfowitz after he dragged the USA into the wars on Iraq and Afghanistan.
McNamara took his advice regarding the situation in Vietnam from General Westmoreland. Westmoreland was a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, and even though he had dragged the USA into a long and bloody war in Vietnam due to his incorrect assessments and proposals, he was made Chief of Staff of the US Army from 1968 to 1972!
Whether the USA was supposed to win the Vietnam War, I don't know. But for ten long, bloody years the USA was prepared to fight Communism, to keep it in check. And the Federal Reserve families who had created Communism in the first place were very happy to finance the war, and keeping it going as long as possible by assassinating those who could stop the war.
The Vietnam War also provoked a reaction in the youth of America, in which the hippie scene grew, with its liberal approach to sex and drugs.
A number of high profile political leaders were assassinated in the USA during the 1960's.
All three of these men wanted to get the USA out of Vietnam. Assassination is not something that occurs often, and it usually occurs when somebody powerful wants to rid themselves of somebody troublesome. It is also a very risky operation, and is not an everyday occurence. All three of these men were strongly opposed to the war in Vietnam, intended to stop it, and had the political clout to do so. They were each allegedly killed by a 'lone gunman'. Subsequent research has debunked those theories. This is yet more proof that things do not 'just happen', but instead have careful and deliberate planning behind them with a particular aim, and a large propaganda campaign afterwards to propagate the official story.
John F Kennedy had resolved to withdraw advisers and United States military forces from Vietnam. In Stone's film JFK, Stone shows the Zapruder film, shot by Abraham Zapruder who was in Dealey Plaza filming the parade on his hand held camera while he stood on a wall. That film clearly shows JFK being shot from several angles, with the kill shot coming from the grassy knoll. In reaction to this shot, JFK's head moves 'back and to the left', and his blood and brains pour out of the back his skull, indicating a shot fired from his front and right, i.e. the grassy knoll, with the bullet not entering the face but instead catching the rear right of his skull and blowing a large hole in the back of JFK's skull. If that shot had come from the Book Depository, behind JFK, then there would have been a smaller entry wound at the back of JFK's skull and either a large exit wound in JFK's face or the bullet burying itself in JFK's skull, neither of which happened, and JFK would have been rocked forward by the momentum of the bullet. The manner in which JFK's alleged assassin, Lee Harvey Oswald, was shot by Jack Ruby in a car park the following day, in front of hundreds of people and cameras without any resistance, stinks. Ruby had been hanging around the police station with a gun all night. Upon his arrest Ruby wanted to tell investigators everything he knew, but did not do so out of fear for his life and those of his family. He, like Diana, predicted the manner of his own death. After an injection for a cold he predicted that he would die of cancer, claiming he had been injected with cancer cells. Ruby suddenly developed cancer in his liver, lungs and brain and died quite quickly. Ruby was talking of "a whole new form of government is going to take over this country", and during a press conference in 1965 he referred to the conspirators again, and when asked if those people held high positions he replied yes.
In March 1968 Bobby Kennedy began to make suggestions to Martin Luther King that the two of them should run on a joint ticket for the White House, with Vietnam a major issue. A few weeks later, on 4th April 1968, King was assassinated, allegedly by another 'lone gunman', James Earl Ray. Ray was a small time thief and burglar, and was totally useless with guns. Ray was pushed into confessing by his legal team, and 'confessed' so that his brother would also receive $500. Ray was given a 99 year sentence, and died in 1998 on the verge of proving his innocence. In late 1999 yet another 'lone gunman' hypothesis was shattered, for in late 1999 the King family brought a civil action against Loyd Jowers and others. William Pepper, a human rights lawyer and friend of King, had been privately investigating the assassination for decades. Pepper discovered that Loyd Powers, owner of the café called Jim's Grill which was underneath the house from where Ray allegedly shot King, owed Frank Liberto a big favour, and was also paid $100,000 by Liberto to arrange the assassination. Liberto worked for Carlos Marcello, who also crops up in the JFK assassination. Pepper also discovered that a special forces team Alpha 184 had been sent as a back-up in case the mafia team arranged via Liberto failed to kill King. A small number of Memphis policemen were also involved. In fact, Pepper believes that it was a Memphis cop, racist and ace marksman called Earl Clark who may well have shot King from behind the large bush close to Jowers' café that was suspiciously cut down the day after the assassination. Immediately after King was shot, Jowers took the weapon from the assassin and ran into his kitchen, running past his girlfriend, to hide the weapon. During the 1999 trial, Jowers confessed all under oath. Pepper believes King was assassinated because the military assessed that his plan to bring many poor and disenfranchised Americans to Washington DC to request that funds for the Vietnam War be diverted into social welfare programs would cause riots, which would use up large portions of the military for crowd control, thus reducing the military resources for the war in Vietnam.
Bobby Kennedy was killed two months later.
Bobby Kennedy was killed by a disillusioned Palestinian Sirhan Sirhan, wasn't he? Apparently not. Witnesses did confirm that Sirhan Sirhan did shoot a gun at Kennedy, but even the coroner for Kennedy, Thomas Noguchi, has never confirmed that Sirhan killed Kennedy. There are doubts about the position of Sirhan's gun when it was fired at Kennedy (somewhere between 2 to 5 feet away from Bobby's body and aimed low), or if it could have caused the burns and powder residue found on Bobby's head and hair, or if the bullet that lodged in Bobby's neck did come from Sirhan's gun, or that the bullets that did hit Kennedy hit him from his rear when many witnesses stated Sirhan was in front of Kennedy (more magic bullets turning in mid-air?). Rose Lynn Mangan was officially appointed as Sirhan's private investigator, and she provides evidence from the LAPD on her website www.sirhansresearcher.com to prove that at least two guns were fired at Kennedy, and that the bullet that lodged in Kennedy's neck did not come from Sirhan's gun. Indeed, Sirhan's gun was apparently firing blanks. Mangan accuses the LAPD of falsifying evidence and incompetent handling of evidence. This evidence to destroy yet another 'lone gunman' hypothesis is backed up by more evidence from Phillip Van Praag. Van Praag, a professional engineer with experience in electronics and acoustics, analysed the only audio recording of the assassination, made accidentally by Stanislaw Pruszynski. Van Praag was able to identify thirteen gun shots on that recording. Sirhan's gun was only able to fire eight, and nobody saw Sirhan reload. So if Sirhan was not alone, who else took a shot at Kennedy? Who had a motive? Three senior CIA agents were identified by their former colleagues from photographs taken in the hotel as being present at the shooting. They were David Morales, Gordon Campbell and George Joannides. Morales was Chief of Operations for JMWAVE, the CIA anti-Castro operation operating in Miami that handled the Bay of Pigs invasion, which many anti-Castro Cubans and CIA agents thought was betrayed by John F Kennedy. Morales' attorney Robert Walton quoted Morales, "I was in Dallas when we got the son of a bitch and I was in Los Angeles when we got the little bastard." When he was arrested Sirhan was in a very confused state and had no memory of the event, and later exhibited behaviour which suggested he had been under hypnosis during the shooting. From the 1950's, the CIA were very active in the area of mind control and 'manchurian candidates', i.e. hypnotically programmed assassins.
So we are now in the 1970's. Communism had taken firm root in Russia, and during World War 2 was empowered. After World War 2 Communism expanded into China with help from the financiers and agents of the CFR. Communism also tried to expand into South-East Asia, but was curiously kept in check by the same forces who had created and expanded Communism in the first place. This was all part of Albert Pike's plan. The USA is the subject of ridicule and hate after losing the Vietnam War to a bunch of highly-organised and dedicated Communist peasants. Nixon took the USA out of the Bretton-Woods system. The Oil Shock of '73 was engineered at the 1973 Bilderberg conference. The Trilateral Commission was created by David Rockefeller. The US military and intelligence investigated, overtly and covertly, microwave applications on humans. Steve Austin was saving the world on TV. And the USA began to finance the Mujahideen after Zbigniew Brzezinski saw them as part of a long-term plan to drag the USSR into a long bloody war in Afghanistan, a war that would become 'Russia's Vietnam'. This did indeed occur, and the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan is considered to be one of the main reasons for the fall of Communism in Russia. Thus we see the roots of the downfall of Communism being sewn by an agent of the Money Masters. Brzezinski, like McNamara, is a member of The Council on Foreign Relations, The Trilateral Commission and Bilderberg, thus putting him right up there as an insider and a major manipulator. According to Pike's plan, Communism was to be held in check until the time of the final cataclysm. McNamara (CFR/B/TC) held Communism in check in Vietnam. Brzezinski (CFR/B/TC) began its downfall via the Mujahideen in Afghanistan.
We are now at the time for the final social cataclysm.