So why don't you know all this history, and the satanist planning behind it all? A few years ago I saw an advert on BBC TV in which Armando Iannuci played a dog. He was lying in his kennel when his owner came back from shopping. Iannuci popped his head out of the kennel and started talking enthusiastically, like you could imagine a dog talking to its owner. He ended with the suggestion to his owner that after they had had a coffee that they go to the park so that he could pointlessly chase a tennis ball. Now, go to your local park on a Sunday morning, and what do you see? Twenty two blokes pointlessly chasing a football about. What is the difference between the Sunday footballer chasing a football in the park, and a dog chasing a tennis ball in the park? In the situation the human race currently finds itself in, I don't think there is not that much of a difference. So much time, energy and emotion is spent pointlessly chasing balls about, or cheering other people chasing balls about, be they footballs, rugby balls, golf balls, tennis balls, etc.
Sport can be very good for society. It can keep society fit and healthy. But it can also serve to distract and focus concentration on pointless aims too. I used to be into certain sports when I was younger, primarily football, running and cycling. But I have come to realise that approximately 99% of what we see or hear is designed to distract us from the horror of real life and discourage us from thinking about how to change it. This includes everything we see, hear and smell, from the briefest news item on a pointless death (thus provoking the question, Why God? Why?), to the most gruesome, bloody, violent film or video 'game', such as Manhunt. I believe there is no coincidence in the rise of youth violence and the increase in availability of these films and 'games'. Such media is designed to incite violence in man. An article in The Daily Mail of 17th May 2008 entitled Violent video games DO make us feel violent, say two thirds of teenagers reported that
Two-thirds of 12 to 15-year-olds say violence in video games affects their behaviour. Violence in games has 'more impact' on them than violence in film or television, they say. Many children supported calls for console settings that restrict game-playing according to age group, in a survey by media regulator Ofcom.
Just think how the brains of our youth are being wired as they grow during their teenage years. Certain pathways in the brain will grow to the detriment of others. The neurons in the brain will be trained for violence. And we see this already, with increasing numbers of youths committing unprovoked and wanton violent crime on their fellow man. One crime I noticed was reported in The Sun, in which four youths in South London gang-raped a single mother in front of her young cildren, filming the rape, and they then put the film on YouTube!!
We are easy to manipulate, in one way or another. That's why we go to war so easily. I would bet that if there was a large scale campaign to produce 'good' films and 'good' video games then we would see an increase in 'good' deeds, e.g. more people wanting to become nurses, teachers and doctors etc, a lot more charity and a massive reduction in crime. I don't think crime can be eliminated totally, but a vast reduction can be achieved if the media and games focused on good rather than bad. The more bad is seen the more we see bad as common, as thus we become bad.
Eating crap and drinking crap doesn't help either. Genetic Modification is 'good', we are told, along with 'It will eradicate hunger because more food can be grown'. This is total rubbish. GM has two purposes;
If the people at the top of society really wanted to eradicate hunger they would cancel all debt, and replace the current financial system with a fairer and more transparent one. But the day that happens will be the day the sun stops shining.
But there are other more Satanist schemes of control. One is the use of drugs, be it a pint of lager, or an injection of heroin. Our bodies are also electromagnetic conductors, and thus can be affected by electromagnetism.
I like a few pints with friends, or a glass or two of a smooth, rich Rioja. But should alcohol be so available? Why is it so available, considering many commentators recognise a binge-drinking culture in the UK that makes us distinct from Europe. Several MPs have indicated that alcohol from supermarkets can be cheaper than water. In August 2007, Garry Newlove was killed outside his house in Warrington by several youths, after he had asked them to stop causing trouble. The youths, all white, were very drunk and high on cannabis. The local newspaper The Warrington Guardian printed what the youths had been drinking that day. Many town centres are no-go areas at night, even in mid-week, and have been for a number of years, due to drink and the resulting violence. Since Blair introduced the 24 hour licence, crime has reduced slightly, but there has been a distinct rise in violent crime in the early hours of the morning, and the Police are finding it difficult to cope with.
What such violence does is make the general population more fearful and afraid, and thus more manageable, and also more likely to accept oppressive legislation that can later be applied to activities other than drinking, such as peaceful protest.
And when our youths grow up, their behaviour will also make us the thugs of the planet, more likely to go to war and tolerate more thuggish, violent and anti-social behaviour.
Afghanistan is the major source of opium in the world, and is required for heroin. By 2001 the Taliban had almost destroyed all the opium crop, but since the invasion of Afghanistan, following the 11th September 2001 attacks on the USA, opium production in Afghanistan has quickly soared to record levels, despite the presence of Anglo-American task forces whose sole purpose was to stop such production.
Why?
The large scale opium trade can be traced back to Great Britain, with Anglophile Americans joining in, who used opium as a weapon to take control of China during the Opium Wars of the 19th Century. The Chinese were forced to accept ship loads of opium as payment for goods, over the protest of the Chinese leadership, because the Chinese wanted payment in silver and British coffers had very little silver. The Chinese became addicted to the opium, with the resulting general stupor, rendering the Chinese much easier to takeover and control. When the Chinese Emperor tried to stop the opium smuggling into China, siezing many chests of opium, Great Britain declared war. In 1842, following this first opium war, The Treaty of Nanking was negotiated between China and Great Britain, and provided for China to pay Great Britain $6 million for opium that had been confiscated by Chinese authorities, $3 million for debts owed by British traders into China, and $12 million for the cost of the war, all to be paid in silver. Five Chinese ports, Canton, Amoy, Foochow, Ningpo and Shanghai, were opened up to British traders to trade with whoever they wished. Hong Kong was also given to the British. Opium was not legalised, but substantial trade in opium continued through these ports. Over a decade later, after opium had reduced Chinese resistance further, Great Britain started a second opium war on China, to open up the whole of China. Following the second opium war, we read in Dope, Inc.
Within four years of the signing of the Treaty of Tientsin (October 25, 1860), Britain was in control of seven eighths of the vastly expanded trade into China. This trade amounted to over £20 million in 1864 alone. Over the next 20 years, the total opium export from India — the overwhelming majority of which was still funneled into China — skyrocketed from 58,681 chests in 1860 to 105,508 chests in 1880.
For India read Afghanistan.
The families and businesses who were actively involved in, and profited from, the opium trade into China during this time were;
But that was in the mid-19th Century. What is all the Afghan opium being used for now?
One reason for the need to get opium production back upto pre-9/11 levels is to stupify sections of the European population as the march towards unelected European government/dictatorship proceeds. This has been accompanied with 'music' scenes, in which drugs are essential, which will be addressed next.
These three drugs are associated with the 'rave' scene, but cocaine use grew during the disco era, while amphetamine was used during WW2 to keep scarce pilots awake, and has appeared in several drug cultures since then, e.g. mods, northern soul. These drugs stimulate some chemicals in the body, such as noradrenalin, to keep it going, and are thus useful for all-night raves and parties. Music can make the taking of such drugs enjoyable and attractive. The presence of attractive members of the opposite sex in clubs where the music is played also makes taking drugs enjoyable. But, overtime, the all-nighters gradually take their toll, fatigue sets in, the body loses vital minerals, nutrients and fluids, which are not replaced via a proper diet, and eventually clarity of thought is affected, and indifference and apathy set in.
Such 'scenes' are promoted as rebellion against an oppressive society, and sexual freedom is also encouraged. Real political resistance is reduced by these 'scenes', because the kids and young adults are high on drugs, chasing sex and thinking they are challenging authority, when in fact they are arguably acting more square than their sobre parents sat at home being stupified by Coronation Street!
The human body is physical, and electromagnetic. It can therefore be affected by electromagnetic fields. As you can apply a magnetic field to a strip of copper wire to induce an electric current in the wire, you can also apply a magnetic field to the human body to induce an electric current in the human body. Energy in the form of microcurrents flows around our bodies along certain paths. If this flow is steady and constant then we feel well and happy and can function properly, i.e. think clearly and produce good thoughts. But if that flow is disturbed, say by the application of a sufficiently strong magnetic field, then we can become emotionally and physically disturbed. Not only this, the presence of strong electromagnetic fields of certain frequencies induces cancers and abnormalities, either directly or indirectly.
So,
Both of these flood our environment with digital communications.
So, you ask, what is wrong with that? We get clearer TV pictures, and can access the internet virtually anywhere, don't we?
First, clearer TV pictures simply means clearer propaganda and clearer 'soft' mind control, and by 'soft' I mean psychological control, i.e. your attention and concentration is focused on useless information or a virtual reality such as Coronation Street. Similarly for internet-anywhere where you can catc the latest 'news' on your favourite celebrity.
Second, the danger of a universal sea of digital communications is the effect that digital communications, and specifically digital microwaves, can have on the human body, particularly the brain. Basically, at certain frequencies, digital microwaves act like a very rapid hammer to the brain, disturbing its function, releasing chemicals, and thus affecting clarity of thought and body function. I call this 'hard' mind control. The use of the terms 'soft' and 'hard' is analogous to computer software and physical hardware.
During the 1970's, when as a kid I was cycling around on choppers, skateboarding, bouncing around on spacehoppers, and playing conkers and marbles, the CIA and American Military investigated the application of electromagnetics, specifically microwaves, to the human body. They found that;
So there is the potential to influence someone's thoughts, either through suggestion or directly altering brain freqency, as well as inflicting irreversible damage.
The logo of Vodafone gives some insight into the purpose of global digital microwave communications. We know 666 as the number of the beast. Why are there three sixes in Vodafone's logo?
When it was tested, the police and military communication network known as Tetramast was found to change the personalities of the officers working in the environment where Tetramast was operational. Officers in Lancashire reported feeling ill, aggressive and violent. This is significant evidence that digital microwaves are extremely powerful and dangerous to the human mind and body, and can be applied en masse through a nationwide network of digital transmitter masts.
But why would Tetramast operate at such frequencies?
Are the authorities unaware of the research that has been done into this area?
I doubt it.
Germany has banned wireless internet in schools for fear that it damages children. On 18th May 2008 an article in The Independent on Sunday entitled Warning: Using a mobile phone while pregnant can seriously damage your baby reported that pregnant women using their mobile phones can damage their unborn child, and this damage is exacerbated if those same children when young use mobile phones too.
Gradually evidence is being produced that this electromagnetic sea of digital microwaves has a detrimental effect on us, despite government telling us everything is good and well.
But they also sent our troops into Iraq looking for WMD...